“As we’ve discussed, unfortunately, it’s been almost impossible to win a 512(f) claim over a bogus DMCA takedown. The entertainment industry has fought hard to make sure that sending totally bogus DMCA notices that censor content are basically unpunishable, unless they can show a willful and intentional decision to ignore fair use and censor the content. Liberation doubled down even after being told that Lessig believed the video was fair use. On top of that, by filing the lawsuit himself, and seeking the declaratory judgment, instead of being sued first, it means that Liberation can’t just dismiss the lawsuit (they’re now the defendant, not the plaintiff).”
Related posts:
Could Shapeshifting 'Material Support' Doctrine Take A Bite Out Of Apple?
Ex-Marine Arrested for Wearing Wrong T-Shirt at Supreme Court
Google, Yahoo back doors to US intel agencies: Ex-security official
Why Mt. Gox, the World’s First Bitcoin Exchange, is Dying
DEA Responds to Legal Weed in Colorado and Washington: "Enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act...
Cruelty and Criminality Combine in the Vernal, Utah Police Department
'Swatting' prank results in police killing of unrelated Kansas man
EU 'Terrorism' Directive Would Create Centralized Database of Bitcoin Users
Bank run starts in Ukraine; Long Queues to Withdraw Cash
TSA Still Awful After 17 Years
Boston Police Tracking Protesters
Here Are 15 Countries With No Income Taxes Whatsoever
Liberty Dollar relaunches as silver-backed cryptocurrency
California dad 'begged for his life' as police beat him to death - witnesses
RoboCoin’s Bitcoin ATM lets you buy Bitcoin with cash: ‘grandma friendly’