“As NJ Senator Robert Menendez said at the Kerry hearing today in the Senate, Syria is about Iran. And it is for AIPAC too. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee broke its silence today, urging a vote for the Syrian strike. AIPAC was lying low. That was what everyone said. So: Who called AIPAC? And: why does Obama need AIPAC? Could it be because AIPAC can get 70 Senators’ signatures on a napkin in 24 hours? Also, if the Tea Party is so ‘isolationist,’ as the media keep insisting, then why is Marco Rubio gungho on a Syria attack? Does it have anything to do with presidential ambitions?”
Related posts:
The Easiest Country to Obtain Residency: Panama
Huge jump in number of “published expatriates” in Federal Register
Student Loan Debt Growing, Along With Delinquency Rate
How to become a drone target
Justin Bieber: Sen. Klobuchar 'Should Be Locked Up' For Felony Streaming Bill [2011]
What 1 Ton Of Gold Looks Like
Win for Chicago gun owners: City Council rewrites gun laws
Again, Reuters Compares Central Bankers to Superheroes!
Persian Handmade Shoes: Why Bitcoin
IRS Official in Charge During Tea Party Targeting Now Runs IRS Obamacare Office
Life Takes Visa—Except If You Want to Buy Pot
During the shutdown, some scientists can't talk about science
Why It's Cheaper to Lease a New Electric Car Than to Buy One Used
Is NYC mayoral favorite Bill de Blasio a Soros front man?
It's Crazy Until It's Not: 3D-Printing Homes For the World's Poor