“The Administration is considering intervening in the Syrian civil war. We oppose this. There’s no vital national security involved. We are not the world’s policeman, nor its judge and jury. Our own needs in America are great, and they come first. The death of civilians is always regrettable, and civil war is regrettable, but no Americans have been attacked, and no American allies have been attacked. The British Parliament understandably has voted not to join in any attack. Notably, defense contractor Raytheon’s stock is up 20% in the last 60 days. It seems that nobody wants US intervention in Syria except the military-industrial complex. I oppose US military intervention in Syria. Join me.”
Related posts:
Bitcoin’s complex and changing regulatory environment
The Minimum Wage and Unemployment in Australia
Bill Bonner: Ike was right!
Will Grigg: Sex Predators in Uniform
The Luxury Homes That Torture and Your Tax Dollars Built
Russian Advanced Weapons for Syria: Unrevealed Secrets
Peter Schiff: Tapering the Taper Talk
Bitcoins Seized By DEA
A Crackdown On Browsers
Americans' sense of freedom drops below Paraguay, Rwanda
Danes Rethink a Welfare State Ample to a Fault
In Syria, US sides with local jihadists to defeat global ones
Xerxes Is On The Move
Botnet fraud wreaking havoc on advertisers: report
Popular Artificial Sweetener Penetrating the Gulf Stream, UNC Wilmington Scientists Confirm [2011]
