
“While Congress, yawning and stretching its arms after the August recess, is just starting to figure out how it wants to respond to President Obama’s call on Saturday for a vote on punitive strikes on Syria, several distinct contingents have emerged in the Congressional debate, each represented by a familiar face on Capitol Hill: 1. The Administration contingent; 2. The Amash-Paul ‘no strikes’ contingent; 3. The Reid-Menendez-Leahy ‘limited strikes’ contingent; 4. The Graham-McCain ‘more than strikes’ contingent; 5. The ‘I’m Running in 2016’ contingent.”
Related posts:
Supreme court cellphone case puts free speech – not just privacy – at risk
United Nations draws up emergency plan for Syria strike
Brazil Millionaires Should Pay for Protest Demands, Party Says
British Somalis dread ban of ‘herbal high’ khat
Obama mocks Lew’s loopy signature: Don’t devalue the dollar with illegible writing
Report: Assad agreed to quit on own conditions, US refused
Bill Gross: Central bank 'casinos' to run out of luck
Why Did Chinese ATMs Stop Working Last Week?
Obama launches $100 million brain-mapping project
Syria's Assad bans all foreign currency in commercial transactions
FDA May Have Age Restrictions On Cups Of Coffee
Pakistan Unhappy Over Reports US Drone Strikes Will Continue
John Kerry gives Syria week to hand over chemical weapons or face attack
Trump approves Pentagon warfighting authority expansion
Sex is major reason military commanders are fired