“The US must bomb Syria, we are told, to maintain its ‘credibility’ on the world stage. I don’t get it. The US government invaded, occupied, and destabilized Afghanistan and Iraq. The US military uses cluster bombs, white phosphorus, and depleted uranium shells, all banned or discouraged by international treaty or convention. The President endorses extrajudicial execution, extraordinary rendition, and torture, all prohibited by the Geneva Conventions. The NSA spies on its own citizens, in violation of US law, and denies it until caught. What credibility could the US government possibly have?”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/credibility/
Related posts:
Most Bizarre Hedging Statement Ever?
Iran's Concern Over US Attack Plans Could...Provoke US Attack!
Obama Has a New 401(k) – Yours
Edward Snowden's not the story. The fate of the internet is
Rest of World Begins to Catch Up to Daily Bell?
Judge Napolitano Weighs In On Effort To Change U.S. Tax Laws to Go After Offshore Tax Havens
A Social Phenomenon: Protests Erupt in Brazil
Doug Casey: The Gold Crash Is Not What Either Bulls or Bears Are Telling You
State Department: “We cannot make India look at you as an American”
Bill Bonner: What if Mr. Summers weren't so brilliant, after all?
Lessons from the First Jobs of Financial Gurus
Can the Internet Tax Be Stopped Just Like the Attack On Syria?
Bill Bonner: Can the Fed's "Credit Cure" Really Work?
3 Myths About Secession
Ron Paul: Neocons Are Back With a Big War Budget and Big War Plans
