“The U.S. government was one of the only commentators to express unqualified endorsement of the proposed changes in the registry agreement. And it was pressure from law enforcement interests promoted by the U.S. government that also led to the troubles in negotiating the RAA. We see accountability and responsibility for policy making migrating further and further away from the individuals and organizations who participate in ICANN’s bottom up process, and towards state actors and ICANN staff. A key contributor to this migration is the idea of a monarchical ability of the authorities to discern ‘the public interest’ and impose rules, top down, on the public itself to pursue that ‘public interest.'”
http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/09/05/meltdown-ii-the-unilateral-right-to-amend/
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin