“President Obama’s request for express congressional authorization for a limited aerial invasion of Syria raises profound legal and constitutional questions. For starters, there is simply no legal basis in international law to support an American invasion of Syria. Yet, notwithstanding that, federal law permits the president to commit U.S. military forces anywhere he wants for up to 90 days, without express authorization from Congress. So, why did Obama ask for the authorization he surely knows he already has?”
Related posts:
Where Is He Now?
Michael Scheuer: Bin Laden predicted Obama’s war on the 4th Amendment
Justin Raimondo: The Iron Fist in Tampa
Do Immigrants Have the Right to Pursue Happiness?
Is the lawlessness of Obama's drone policy coming home?
The Pension Rate-of-Return Fantasy
About the Federal Reserve Police
ECB: Bank With Us … and We’ll Charge You Interest
Over 600 kids at the U.S. border were taken as their parents were jailed
The 12 Gold Bugs of Christmas
Detlev Schlichter: Bubble trouble: Is there an end to endless quantitative easing?
Be on the Lookout: Amazon Turns its Gaze to Surveillance
Peter Schiff, Trumpcare: Different Plan, Same Problems
Thomas Friedman and the Wish for War with Iran
When The Window Closes For Americans