“President Obama’s request for express congressional authorization for a limited aerial invasion of Syria raises profound legal and constitutional questions. For starters, there is simply no legal basis in international law to support an American invasion of Syria. Yet, notwithstanding that, federal law permits the president to commit U.S. military forces anywhere he wants for up to 90 days, without express authorization from Congress. So, why did Obama ask for the authorization he surely knows he already has?”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
John Hussman: Air-Pockets, Free-Falls, and Crashes
Michael Scheuer: For Egypt’s Islamists war is a legitimate option
Will Grigg: What Holder Really Said
Ron Paul on New Egyptian War: Americans Lose, Again
Bill Bonner: How America’s Working Stiffs Got Stiffed
Bill Bonner: The Cryptocurrency Revolution
The West Is Closing Its Doors - To Westerners Themselves
Ron Paul: Against Neocon Domination
Government, Stop Trying to "Help" Uber
The Guns of Zagreb
Krugman thinks low interest rates are behind the boom in paper currency. Not so fast!
Nigel Farage: Collapsing The System & Enslaving People
Germany’s Hitler-Era Homeschool Laws Still In (Brute) Force
Jacob Hornberger: Operation Jade Helm
Will Canada’s hard line on Eritrea’s ‘diaspora’ tax apply to the U.S.?