“A recent case in which a man was charged in court with possession of cannabis – even though the police found no cannabis on his person – turns out to be far more commonplace than one would think. According to criminal lawyer Dr Joe Giglio, this case was no by means a one-off incident. In fact he claims that as many as half the cases pressed by the police for possession of illicit substances will not be based on the discovery of any drugs in the possession of the accused, adding that the police have a standard formula for how to extract such confessions from unwitting suspects.”
(Visited 32 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Concern over NSA privacy violations unites Democrats and Republicans, poll finds
Icelanders Demanding Up to 50% Pay Rise Show Crisis Ripples
Hello Kitty Doll Lands Tulsa State Fair Worker In Jail
‘Missing’ French tourists found safe at home after prompting a manhunt
$1M in forgivable loans offered to rehab seized Marygrove homes
Tenn. techie denies being hacker in Romney tax returns case
The end of the mortgage party? Home lending plummets at big banks
U.S. ex-DEA agent in unlikely new role with pot investment firm
Online Renegade, Wanted in U.S., Shakes Up New Zealand Election
Japan warns Britain to stay in the European Union
Real life CSI: Google's new AI system unscrambles pixelated faces
Private Investor and Trader Joe Lewis Not Backing Bitcoin Ventures, Contra WSJ
The NSA: ‘The Abyss from Which There Is No Return’
$10m NSA contract with security firm RSA led to encryption backdoor
Homeland Security tracks down 400-page diary of Nazi leader and Hitler aide