“A recent case in which a man was charged in court with possession of cannabis – even though the police found no cannabis on his person – turns out to be far more commonplace than one would think. According to criminal lawyer Dr Joe Giglio, this case was no by means a one-off incident. In fact he claims that as many as half the cases pressed by the police for possession of illicit substances will not be based on the discovery of any drugs in the possession of the accused, adding that the police have a standard formula for how to extract such confessions from unwitting suspects.”
(Visited 32 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Argentina mulls benefits cut for dollar buyers
Obama offers 'grand bargain' on corporate tax rate, infrastructure
Banking with Bitcoin
Jim Rogers still shorting U.S. Treasuries
Supreme Court Messes With East Texas ‘Patent Troll’ Hotbed
Mexico says marijuana legalization in U.S. could change anti-drug strategies
California's War on Guns Broadens to a War on Ammunition
Pew Poll: More Than 1 In 4 Americans Believe Government Is The Enemy
'Peculiar' Market Strikes Again With Sale of 100-Year Austrian Bond
Edward Snowden, NSA whistleblower: 'I do not expect to see home again'
Lamassu Bitcoin ATM on CNBC
DEA taskforce member charged with stealing at least $36,000-worth of drugs
‘The U.S. effect’: Researchers encouraged to report exaggerated or eye-catching results
Want to make money as a landlord? Try Detroit
New York fails Common Core tests; more states to follow