“To be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war. So, why the Orwellian ‘War is Peace’ attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.”
(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
U.S. Now Bombing Assad Forces Openly In Syria
Paul Craig Roberts: Gangster State US/UK
The National Archives: Lawbreaker and Cover-Upper
Peter Schiff: Gold in the Crosshairs
David Galland: Paradigm Collapse
About the Federal Reserve Police
Dangerous Organizations of the National Security State
One Man’s Trash is Another Man’s Big Data
Andrew Sullivan Change Of Heart: 'Cameron Proves Greenwald Right'
Benghazi: Who Cares?
Obama On Football
Cops held liable in SWAT killing of unarmed man; city blames jurors' racial bias
Why Cops Bust Down Doors of Medical Pot Growers, But Ignore Men Who Keep Naked Girls on Leashes
As Canada Collapses, Do We Need to Ask Why?
Doug Casey: Why America Should Default and You Should Live Abroad