“To be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war. So, why the Orwellian ‘War is Peace’ attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Crisis and Opportunity in the Junior Miners
US Egypt Policies Don't Pass the Laugh Test
Super-Mario's new dawn
John Hussman: Reversing the Speculative Effect of QE Overnight
What happened in West, Texas?
Obama On Football
Anthony Gregory: States Thumb Their Noses at the Drug War
Deja Vu: The Fed's Real "Policy Error" Was To Encourage Years of Speculation
Bernanke to Oprah: "I've Been Doping for Years"
Lew Rockwell & Joe Salerno: War, Terror, and Banking
Doug French: Separating the Banking Wheat from the Chaff
Pat Buchanan: Too Many Wars. Too Many Enemies.
Ron Paul: Why Can't We Sue the TSA For Assault?
Jacob Hornberger: The Deep State Went After JFK on Russia Too
Selective Outrage Will Not End Government Abuses