“To be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war. So, why the Orwellian ‘War is Peace’ attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Government Imposed Disaster: Price Controls in the Wake of Sandy
Where Will QE3 Take Us?
What happened in West, Texas?
Illegal Drugs: The great experiment
US drowning in blood of innocents as civilian casualties deemed acceptable
As Predicted, Third Way Surges to Fore in Middle East
Krugman thinks low interest rates are behind the boom in paper currency. Not so fast!
Ron Paul: If You Like The Surveillance State, You’ll Love E-Verify
How Many Muslims in the World? How Many Muslim Terrorists?
From the IRS to the EPA?
No More Solyndras? Not Quite
11 Reasons Why We Should Not Attack Syria
Guilty of Aiding the American People
Should Obama and Congress Be Arrested Under the NDAA?
Christopher Dorner and the Chaos Inherent to Government