“To be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war. So, why the Orwellian ‘War is Peace’ attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
(Visited 32 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Cyprus and the reality of banking: Deposit haircuts are both inevitable and the right thing to do
Obama: Fool Me Thrice, Shame on Whom?
Michael Scheuer: In Mali, the interventionist establishment already is lying about “unintended conse...
Marxism didn’t die. It’s alive and well and living among us
Cracking of the Euro-Elite ... The Triumph of Hope?
Digital Technologies vs. Truth Suppression
Jim Bovard: The Pro-War Media Deserve Criticism, Not Sainthood
The Tide of Power
Paul Craig Roberts: The Two Faux Democracies Threaten Life On Earth
Peter Schiff: 'Operation Screw: The Fed goes all-in on QE'
Glenn Greenwald: Correspondence and collusion between the New York Times and the CIA
Do We Really Want a Cold War II?
Paula Was Not the Only One in Bed With Petraeus
The Will Of The People Doesn’t Mean Jack To Drug Warriors
Ensuring the Boundaries of Truth