“Preserve the crime scene. Follow the money trail. Establish the motive. Look for those with the means to pull off the crime. Any criminal investigator will tell you that these are the most basic principles of any investigation. But none of them were followed on 9/11. Of course, there was no serious criminal investigation. No attempt to preserve the evidence or establish the means, motive or opportunity. No inclination to follow the money. The 9/11 commission itself concluded that the funding of the attacks were of ‘little practical significance.’ From the very first moments after the attack, the fix was in.”
Related posts:
Legal Gun Owners in New York Outed Like Sex Offenders
Why Didn't “60 Minutes” Mention The U.S. Is Fueling the Yemen Conflict?
Italy's ex-intelligence chief given 10-year sentence for role in CIA kidnapping
Real Food vs Food Pyramid Non-Food
Deadly Contradictions: Patent Privilege vs. “Saving Lives”
Why is California Jailing Landscapers? Don't Cops Have Better Things to Do?!
Michigan: Municipalities Ignoring Voters' Will Regarding Marijuana Liberalization Measures
Paypal freezes $45,000 of Mailpile’s crowdfunded dollars
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: NSA leaker is a hero
China's Gold Fever Rises, Showing No Signs Of Abating
Bill O’Reilly suddenly opposed to NSA surveillance he supported under Bush
The End of Tax Havens?
EU backs plans by member states to arm Kurds in Iraq
UK Asked New York Times To Destroy Edward Snowden Documents, Request Ignored
Bloomberg Article Describes the Death of Digital Privacy: Snowden’s Revenge
