“Events in Syria are of marginal importance to us, and on the edge of our ability to influence. Since the civil war in Syria is a major focus of the world-wide, longstanding struggle between Islam’s Sunni and Shia factions, what will happen there will be determined by Syrians and their neighbors regardless of what the US government does or does not do. The Syrian civil war’s importance to us, however, may well be that it is reminding us of how we should deal with matters of war and peace, namely: concretely, logically, un-emotionally, jealously matching the ends we seek with the means we are willing to use. American statesmen have not done that consistently for a century.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=4719
Related posts:
Bitcoin's dilemma: go mainstream, or stay radical?
Bill Bonner: A Close Encounter with Zombiedom
The Worst Inflation in My Lifetime
Are Police in America Now a Military, Occupying Force?
Paul Craig Roberts: The Case of the Missing Recovery
The State's Worst Atrocity
A Common-Sense View of the Stock Market
Paul Rosenberg: The Internet Is Being Slaughtered in the Back Room
Everything Is Modular . . . Is Governance Next?
How crossing the US-Mexico border became a crime [2017]
Creator of Netscape, Marc Andreessen: 'Why Bitcoin Matters'
The Pentagon, CIA, and NSA Are in Charge
David Galland: Three Levels of Survival Skills
Arbitrary enforcement, secrecy, self-interest, and the loss of government legitimacy
US Is World's Largest Tax Haven