“We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that Bashar al-Assad was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this. In writing this brief report, we choose to assume that you have not been fully informed because your advisers decided to afford you the opportunity for what is commonly known as ‘plausible denial.'”
Related posts:
The Ascent of Whatever-It-Takes Banking Is a Good Thing?
Merry Christmas and Happy Gun Control, Chicago
The Hyperloop: Elon Musk’s futuristic plan to blast Californians through a tube
New York firefighter makes fake 911 calls to rob empty firehouses
Microsoft alum promises to ‘mint millionaires’ with future U.S.-Mexico marijuana trade
War on Terror's Economic and Mortality Costs Have Yet to Be Tallied
The War on Money Laundering Is Causing the Wrong Kind of Casualties
Murder Mystery? Michael Hastings and a CyberSecurity Firm Called Endgame
The Evolution of the Marijuana Marketplace
Washington cops working to ‘desensitize’ drug dogs to marijuana smell
Taking the Police State Train
Boston mayor says he would ‘blow up’ Detroit, defuses situation with apology
Tulsa police shoot dead unarmed black man with hands in air
Welfare Drug Testing Catches Only 12 Users In Utah
Homelanders propose more tax hikes on U.S. Persons abroad