“We have no problem with the police intervening to end a criminal shootout. So why do we so passionately oppose having the U.S. federal state intervene in Syria and other places? There are multiple reasons. The Feds have a really bad track record (you can read a summary here); Tend to support bad guys and establish dictatorships; Constantly create new enemies; Force all Americans to support these interventions, even when they offend personal conscience. But does this mean that we have to sit idly by and watch bad things happen to good people overseas? We don’t think so. Instead, imagine what would happen if we had a Separation of Intervention and State.”
http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/whom-would-you-hire-to-intervene-in-syria
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
(Visited 36 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Doug Casey on Opting-Out
The Suicide of Communism: The Case for Patience
The Biggest Interest-Rate Turn in 37 Years
Why you need offshore gold storage
Glenn Greenwald: from MLK to Anonymous, the state targets dissenters
The Gender Wage Gap Lie
The States Could Reform Obamacare If Only We Would Let Them
Drivers, Beware Traffic Stops in the American Police State
The cops are a dangerous replacement for private gun ownership
Let’s stop wrecking lives over a bag of weed
2014: The First Year of the 21st Century Dark Age
Americans Are War Weary ... And The Neocons Don't Like It
The last days of the IRS
Ron Paul: Government Policies Hurt Low-Wage Workers
Bill Bonner: Price does not tell you all you need to know