“To understand the significance of this, suppose that the U.S. Congress or British Parliament had just passed a law, but one lobbying group didn’t like it. Suppose that the President or the British Prime Minister convened a closed meeting with a small group of invited ‘stakeholders’ and agreed on a ‘strawman proposal’ to amend the legislation. The new legislation makes the first group happy but most other stakeholders unhappy. But nevertheless, the chief executives went on to order its executive branch to implement the revised legislation without any review and approval by the Congress/Parliament. That is exactly what ICANN did.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
It’s a Sound-Money Alternative to the Dollar
Ron Paul: Gold is Good Money
The Century of Arbitration and Peace
What Happens When You Can't Believe A Thing The President Says?
How to Safely Internationalize your Domain Name
A Colonial Gatekeeper That Hillary Would've Approved Of
Deputizing America
Internet Fascism and the Surveillance State
Internationalize to Escape Obamacare
Ben Bernanke – Revisiting The Helicopter Speech
The Shocking Real Reason for FATCA, and What Comes Next
Jeffrey Tucker: Why Imagining Freedom Is Essential
Thoughts Have Consequences
Bitcoin Takes on Gold
Will Grigg: Abolish Your Local Police