“To understand the significance of this, suppose that the U.S. Congress or British Parliament had just passed a law, but one lobbying group didn’t like it. Suppose that the President or the British Prime Minister convened a closed meeting with a small group of invited ‘stakeholders’ and agreed on a ‘strawman proposal’ to amend the legislation. The new legislation makes the first group happy but most other stakeholders unhappy. But nevertheless, the chief executives went on to order its executive branch to implement the revised legislation without any review and approval by the Congress/Parliament. That is exactly what ICANN did.”
(Visited 27 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Jacob Hornberger: Why Kennedy Had to Be Removed
Beyond Civil Disobedience
Why I Am an Anarcho-Capitalist
Does Gold’s Price Matter to the Central Banks? No.
Pippa Malmgren on Success
Roving Bandit, Stationary Bandit, and Income Tax
Paul Craig Roberts: Attack On Sovereignty
Immense, Needless Human Misery Caused by Speculative Credit Bubbles
Roger Ver: Why Bitcoin is Important for the World
America’s Schools Transform Into Authoritarian Instruments of Compliance
Citizenship, identity, mourning loss of identity and moving on …
A Day in the Life of a Regulated Financial Professional
Barack Obama’s Nixonian Fed Pick
The Only Legal Way to Escape US Taxes Besides Death and Renunciation
Indians should help Bitcoin eclipse the empires of rupee and dollar