“To understand the significance of this, suppose that the U.S. Congress or British Parliament had just passed a law, but one lobbying group didn’t like it. Suppose that the President or the British Prime Minister convened a closed meeting with a small group of invited ‘stakeholders’ and agreed on a ‘strawman proposal’ to amend the legislation. The new legislation makes the first group happy but most other stakeholders unhappy. But nevertheless, the chief executives went on to order its executive branch to implement the revised legislation without any review and approval by the Congress/Parliament. That is exactly what ICANN did.”
(Visited 27 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
A President Who Didn't Want the Job [2013]
China plans to turn itself into a country of 19 super-regions
10 investing insights from Street Smarts by Jim Rogers
Rising Inequality and Poverty: Can They Be Fixed?
Anthony Gregory: Obama’s Persecution of Bradley Manning
The Venezuelan Crisis Is Due to Economic Ignorance
Real ID Exposed: It Is Worse Than You Think
Chris Martenson: Bankers Own the World - And are ultimately destroying it
Bitcoin's dilemma: go mainstream, or stay radical?
The American Empire vs. Your Retirement Prospects
Why Is the United States So Hypocritical in Foreign Policy?
Former IMF Chief Economist: Sadly, Too Big to Fail Is Not Over
Nazi gold and currency wars - A full guide
Ron Paul: Private Property Is the Essence of Liberty
Election won't prevent pension crash