“To understand the significance of this, suppose that the U.S. Congress or British Parliament had just passed a law, but one lobbying group didn’t like it. Suppose that the President or the British Prime Minister convened a closed meeting with a small group of invited ‘stakeholders’ and agreed on a ‘strawman proposal’ to amend the legislation. The new legislation makes the first group happy but most other stakeholders unhappy. But nevertheless, the chief executives went on to order its executive branch to implement the revised legislation without any review and approval by the Congress/Parliament. That is exactly what ICANN did.”
Related posts:
How to Safely Internationalize your Domain Name
Julian Assange on Google and the NSA: Who’s holding the ‘sh*t-bag’ now?
Poor Economy = Low Gold Price?
Gold and Syria
Paul Ehrlich predicted an imminent population catastrophe in 1965
Present Shock and the Fantasy of Change
Agorism and Nazism: A Study in Polar Opposites
Why a Police State?
The American Surveillance State Is Here. Can It Be Evaded?
Economic Fascism and the Power Elite
Memory's Half-Life: A Social History of Wiretaps
Bill Bonner: What I'm Doing With My Money Now
Ron Paul and the Future - Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
I Wish My Job Didn't Exist
Jeffrey Tucker, Captured, Cuffed, and Jailed: A Personal Story
