“To understand the significance of this, suppose that the U.S. Congress or British Parliament had just passed a law, but one lobbying group didn’t like it. Suppose that the President or the British Prime Minister convened a closed meeting with a small group of invited ‘stakeholders’ and agreed on a ‘strawman proposal’ to amend the legislation. The new legislation makes the first group happy but most other stakeholders unhappy. But nevertheless, the chief executives went on to order its executive branch to implement the revised legislation without any review and approval by the Congress/Parliament. That is exactly what ICANN did.”
Related posts:
John Grisham: After Guantánamo, Another Injustice
Chris Becker on South Africa, Gold and the Ludwig von Mises Institute
Wendy McElroy: Let a Thousand Home Businesses Bloom
The US Imperium, Coming Dollar Difficulties and Investing Abroad
James Bovard: The FBI’s Forgotten Criminal Record
All the Value of Gold in the Palm of Your Hand
After the Storm
Which Cities will Survive/Thrive?
Bill Bonner: Turning Argentine...
The Case for Abolishing the Department of Homeland Security
Obama's rogue state tramples over every law it demands others uphold
Jeffrey Tucker: Life Without the McDouble
I'm Astounded by This Terrorism Statute
Smartphone & Laptop Searches: Know Your Rights
The Devil's Chessboard: How the First CIA Director Collaborated With Nazis
