“Even if gun-control laws could actually succeed in keeping firearms from the hands of criminals – a goal they are notoriously ineffective at accomplishing – the reduction to the offensive ability of predators is far less than the loss of defensive capability among the law-abiding. People who devote themselves to a life of crime don’t have much trouble becoming far more physically dangerous than the folks they like to victimize. Ordinary people don’t have the experience or aptitude for violence that criminals usually bring to the table. Also, the victim is often outnumbered during criminal encounters.”
http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/09/15/Criminals-do-not-need-guns
Related posts:
As Canada Collapses, Do We Need to Ask Why?
Bill Bonner: What does money represent?
Google's 'principles' on AI weapons, mass surveillence, and signing out
Fusion center director: We don’t spy on Americans, just anti-government Americans
NSA Cheerleaders Discover Value of Privacy Only When Their Own Is Violated
A century bond? Just think what can happen in 100 years
Nigel Farage: Nigel Lawson calls time on the three-pint Eurosceptic heroes
LAPD: Collateral Damage For The Sake Of The State
Trump has one thing right: our post-9/11 wars have been a mistake
Australia Joins The War On Cash While Venezuela Backtracks Cash Ban
Busybodies battle outbreaks of freedom
Chinese Women Aren’t Taking Buffett’s Advice on Gold
The Disappearing Gold
Richard Ebeling On the Coming Crash in China, On Hayek and Much More
Marc Faber on Gold & Debt