“A couple years ago, we were disappointed to see a judge take the technologically wrong stance that data transmitted over WiFi is not a ‘radio communication,’ thereby making sniffing of unencrypted WiFi signals potentially a form of wiretapping. Indeed, based on that, the court eventually ruled that Google’s infamous WiFi sniffing could be a violation of wiretap laws. This is wrong on so many levels… and tragically, an appeals court has now upheld the lower court’s ruling. There are serious problems with this. Under no reasonable view is WiFi not a radio communication first of all. That’s exactly what it is.”
Related posts:
TSA Will Stop Accepting Driver's Licenses From Nine States On Jan. 10
Police Seize Smart Phone From Bystander
China is building a DMV station powered by AI, not humans
EU To Ban U.S. Cheese From Using Names Like 'Feta' and 'Parmesan'
The NSA Actually Intercepted Packages to Put Backdoors in Electronics
Polish Bitcoin Exchange Bidextreme.pl Hacked, Wallets Emptied
Journalist Accosted By Security Over Mayor Bloomberg Gun Control Question
'Bitcoin Mining' Equipment Firm Took Money & Ran, Investor Says
Public Schools Preach War On Iran
Chilling Development: NSA Takes on Amash Amendment
In Indiana, sex with minors is OK, but it’s illegal to sext them
Caymans win a free tax loophole in exchange for their FATCA signature
The Jobs Number Is B.S., Says Former Head Of B.L.S.
In phishing attack, Microsoft’s unmentionables aired by hacktivists
Illinois’ failing economic model: more food stamps, fewer jobs