“A couple years ago, we were disappointed to see a judge take the technologically wrong stance that data transmitted over WiFi is not a ‘radio communication,’ thereby making sniffing of unencrypted WiFi signals potentially a form of wiretapping. Indeed, based on that, the court eventually ruled that Google’s infamous WiFi sniffing could be a violation of wiretap laws. This is wrong on so many levels… and tragically, an appeals court has now upheld the lower court’s ruling. There are serious problems with this. Under no reasonable view is WiFi not a radio communication first of all. That’s exactly what it is.”
Related posts:
EU To Ban U.S. Cheese From Using Names Like 'Feta' and 'Parmesan'
Court Grants Order to Freeze Hashfast’s Bitcoin Wallets
The Top 6 Reasons Why Everyone Needs a Second Passport
Maastricht mayor does u-turn over cannabis club membership
Is the TSA checking domestic airline passengers for warrants?
European Central Bankers Promise Monetary Inflation for Years
Apple Co-Founder Steve Wozniak Compares NSA Spying to Soviet Russia
Ben Swann Full Disclosure: Al Qaeda in Syria, the Story You Haven't Heard?
US Weapon Stockpile Used by ISIS Found in Syria
Mars One has 78,000 applicants so far—sort of
What the FISA Memo Reveals about the FBI, DNC, GOP–and the sketchy timeline
America Is Setting A Dangerous Precedent For The Drone Age
It’s Now Cheaper to Buy Rather Than Rent in Top 100 U.S. Cities
Third In-Custody Death For The Kern County Sheriff's Dept. In Four Months
Why Facebook Would Have Banned Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin