“A couple years ago, we were disappointed to see a judge take the technologically wrong stance that data transmitted over WiFi is not a ‘radio communication,’ thereby making sniffing of unencrypted WiFi signals potentially a form of wiretapping. Indeed, based on that, the court eventually ruled that Google’s infamous WiFi sniffing could be a violation of wiretap laws. This is wrong on so many levels… and tragically, an appeals court has now upheld the lower court’s ruling. There are serious problems with this. Under no reasonable view is WiFi not a radio communication first of all. That’s exactly what it is.”
Related posts:
The Quickest Way EVER Through A Security Checkpoint
Kentucky town from ‘Colbert Report’ to pay police chief in Bitcoin
"Everyone Is Holding Cash; They Know When It Ends It's Gonna Get Ugly"
IRS Seizes Wedding Boutique, Sells Everything for Next to Nothing
Jeff Bezos’ Amazonian Drones
Don't Cage My Speech! A Student Schools His College
Why Are European Governments So Terrified of 'Fake News'?
Illinois Teacher Retirement System Is Broke
Fukushima Radioactive Plume To Hit The US By Early 2014
Finally, the End of Keynesianism
Brooklyn Bodega Owner: Why Merchants Should Start Accepting Bitcoin
The Birth of a New Bull Market
Bloomberg News Writes About Americans ‘Paying Up’ Wherever They Reside…
A Silver Lining to Obummercare
Banned From the US? There's a Robot for That