“A federal judge tossed the convictions of five ex-New Orleans police officers accused of shooting an unarmed family and firing on others as they tried to flee the flooded city. District Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt issued a 129-page ruling that cited a lengthy list of ‘egregious and inflammatory’ comments made online by at least three Justice Department officials. One of the top federal prosecutors in the case questioned how the officers were issued badges in a comment posted on a newspaper website just minutes before jury selection began, according to the ruling. Prosecutors are forbidden under Justice Department policies from making public statements that could influence the outcome of a case.”
Related posts:
New York Hedge Fund Has Already Taken $5.4m in Bitcoin Deposits
New York lawmaker: I would torture an American citizen
GM soy and corn feed turns pig stomachs to mush
17-year-old tased to death by Miami cops after spray-painting abandoned McDonald's
Shutdown: ObamaCare (No) and the Federal Government (No)
Banned From the US? There's a Robot for That
Texas Man Sues Over Red Light Camera Protest Sign
Mystery pooper: Firm to pay $2.2M over forced DNA testing for workers
National weather agency spared from furloughs after rash of tornadoes
Public buses being outfitted with sophisticated audio surveillance across U.S.
Interview with Jeffrey Tucker and Ben Davenport on the new world of cryptocurrency
Police in Springfield, Mass. adopt Iraq-style ‘counterinsurgency’ tactics
Civil Liberties and Security in an Age of Terrorism
Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Which States Provide the Most Handouts of All?
House unexpectedly votes to stop warrantless NSA searches