
“A federal judge tossed the convictions of five ex-New Orleans police officers accused of shooting an unarmed family and firing on others as they tried to flee the flooded city. District Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt issued a 129-page ruling that cited a lengthy list of ‘egregious and inflammatory’ comments made online by at least three Justice Department officials. One of the top federal prosecutors in the case questioned how the officers were issued badges in a comment posted on a newspaper website just minutes before jury selection began, according to the ruling. Prosecutors are forbidden under Justice Department policies from making public statements that could influence the outcome of a case.”
Related posts:
Cyprus vs Bankocracy: 'Mattress better place to keep cash than banks'
How I Renounced My US Citizenship and Why, Part II
Syracuse’s ‘most prolific sex offender’ lied to acquire government job
Red Light Camera Case Goes To Illinois Supreme Court
Insane 9/11 Homework Assignment Highlights Trauma-based Education
Citibank Is Working On Its Own Digital Currency, Citicoin
Visit the Wrong Website, and the FBI Could End Up in Your Computer
Peter Schiff Was Right - 'Taper' Edition
Fast food workers stage surprise strike in New York City
Capital One closes company’s bank account over mere mention of bitcoin
10 Futuristic or out of the ordinary projects that accept Bitcoin
The Line In The Sand Has Been Drawn
Cop Unions Say Demilitarization Threatens Police. They’re Wrong.
Kentucky town from ‘Colbert Report’ to pay police chief in Bitcoin
Silicon Alps: Switzerland’s seriously ambitious startup scene [2012]