“No Establishment author comes out and says this: ‘The Federal Reserve System possesses complete federal sovereignty, yet is beyond the power of any branch of government. It is legally more independent than the CIA. This is a great thing. Democracy has its limits, and should not be defended as a universally legitimate system of government.’ This is in fact what the entire American Establishment believes, but never, ever says in public. The Establishment says ‘independent,’ not ‘anti-democratic.’ They figure that the rubes — voters — will not catch on. They assume correctly.”
http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/09/23/washington-post-article-identified-fed-chairman-2-power/
Related posts:
The Easiest Country to Obtain Residency: Panama
Argentina Bans All Advertising
5 Investing Myths to Ignore in 2014
Michigan: Municipalities Ignoring Voters' Will Regarding Marijuana Liberalization Measures
British university accepts course fees in Bitcoin
Americans Forced to Close Their Intrade Accounts
Jeffrey Tucker: Who Will Lose in the War on Contractors?
Feds can file criminal charges if you clear your browser history
U.S. Dropped 23,144 Bombs on Muslim-Majority Countries in 2015
Alleged Silk Road founder: If Bitcoin isn't money, how did I launder it?
US Small Business Owners' Hiring Intent Plunges to 2008 Lows
Gone in Less Than a Second
Chinese Hotel: 6 Days to Build
Ben Swann: NSA Using Copyright Claims to Stop Criticism?
Google, Yahoo back doors to US intel agencies: Ex-security official