“The courts have already found that simply not answering questions post-arrest can be used as evidence of guilt. But what happens when you ask for legal representation before the police have arrested or detained you? The prosecution argued that Okatan’s request for a lawyer was itself an admission of guilt. While we all supposedly have a right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, the government (meaning law enforcement and prosecutors — both operatives of the state) have been poking and prodding at the amendments’ weak spots over the years, turning these ‘rights’ into privileges that have to be asserted loudly, unwaveringly and timed correctly. What a joke.”
Related posts:
Reuters Makes the Rational Case for a Surveillance State
Ted Cruz: Obama shouldn’t use U.S. military as ‘Al-Qaeda’s air force’
Obama Voluntarily Resigned as a Lawyer
PayPal freezes GlassUp’s $100K crowdfunding money, eventually releases it
Bank Of Korea Delivers The Latest Surprise Interest Rate Cut This Week
Reporter: Bush ‘negligence’ ignored pre-9/11 warnings
People Keep Getting Charged With a Crime for Selling Bitcoin
Free Staters Not Welcome in New Hampshire
Religious Antipathies Aroused
LinkedIn’s anti-prostitution policy angers legal Nevada brothel owner
Teacher Fired, Reported To Counter-Terror Unit For Expressing Christian Views
Six States That Could Pass Marijuana Initiatives This Year
NSA and Stocks: Paranoia Outstrips the Meme
Dealers hijack Seattle’s gun buyback with makeshift gun show
Beijing Subway, Line 13, morning rush hour - just a little crowded