“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Women Win Lawsuit After Being Violated During Roadside Search
Huge majority wants Clapper prosecuted for perjury
Body scanner ruling could squelch NSA domestic spying
Police Crackdown at Burning Man Alarms the Community
Companies Eliminating Drug Tests Amid Applicant Shortages, Pot Legalization
Trumps Extends Official JFK Cover-Up For Another 50 Years
Seattle Mayor Orders Police to Dismantle Its Drone Program After Protests
Ben Swann Reality Check: Election Special
Energy harvester that creates power from ambient vibrations comes to market
Mt. Gox Settlement Proposal Could Make Former Users Whole
Justin Raimondo: Behind Trump’s Syria Turnabout
Reality Check: What is QE3? And What It Means For The U.S. Economy
Five+ Years of Fed Futility Laid Bare for All to See
Robocoin Bitcoin ATM to Debut in North America’s Largest Mall
“Happy Birthday” copyright defense: Those “words” and “text” are ours