
“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
Related posts:
The World Transformed and No One in America Noticed
Deputies Caught Dumping Name Tags
Before Sir John Marks Templeton, there was Cleveland Ferguson
Baltimore’s Failed Surveillance Regime
The 'Red Pill' Of Economics
Obama Budget Contains Middle Class Income Tax Hike
Why It Took More Than 30 Years to Confirm Vitamin C Fights Cancer
Hello Bitcoin, goodbye Western Union? The future of remittance
The Bush-Obama Great Stagnation
WikiLeaks Volunteer Was a Paid Informant for the FBI
Now’s a Terrible Time to Own This Popular Investment
Marc Faber: Even QE99 won't help US; India best in Asia
Bees Brothers keep thriving and already mined their first Bitcoin
NY Cops Rip Man from Wheelchair, Mace Him, and Beat Him
India mulls leasing of IMF-bought gold