“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Is Bitcoin Hype Making the Value Skyrocket, or the Other Way Around?
Will the next debt crisis be worse than 2008? When will it begin?
On Target Pressure Points: The Electronic Concentration Camp
Mt. Gox Bitcoin Exchange Files for Bankruptcy, Claims $63.6m Debt
Americans Are Voting with Their Feet for Economic Freedom
Jack Lew to John Boehner: Raise debt ceiling in February
U.S. Implements 4th of July ‘No Refusal’ Blood-Draw DUI Checkpoints
The Failing War on Drugs, the Benefits of Natural Cannabis Cultivation
New Study Finds THC Kills Stomach Cancer Cells
Human rights advocates raise concerns over increased police Taser use
Fannie, Freddie Officially Lower Mortgage Down Payment to 3 Percent
“Snowden Effect” in Action: NSA Authority to Collect Bulk Phone Metadata Expires
Florida man’s attorney claims NSA phone records will prove client’s innocence
French Senate Holds Hearings on Bitcoin
Telegram plans multi-billion dollar ICO for chat cryptocurrency