
“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
Related posts:
Greek Taxes Are So High That People Are Turning Down Inheritances
Jim Rogers: Russian/Chinese/Brazil currency can battle dollar dominance
U.S. Court: Journalist Barrett Brown Can't Talk To The Press Any More
Bank Of England To The Fed: "No Indication Should, Of Course, Be Given To The Bundesbank..."
Chinese Gold Rush Underway
Report: Russia Offers to Bail Out Cyprus
Government Trained Killer with 2,746 Confirmed Kills: "They’re just another pencil mark."
Bitcoin Still A Bit Player For Hedge Funds
Luke Rudkowski Questions Larry Silverstein On WTC 7 [2011]
Rescuing “Hitler”: Obama’s Bailout of Assad
A Government Database about our Sex Lives: Gee, What Could Go Wrong?
Fracking protestors and their petro-sourced belongings
Key anecdote to defend NSA data gathering is full of holes
U.S. Currently Fighting 74 Different Wars … That It Will Publicly Admit
Illinois illegally seizes bees resistant to Roundup; kills remaining queens [2012]