
“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
Related posts:
Yellen Says Negative Rates On The Table "If Outlook Worsened"
Blind juggling robot keeps balls in the air for hours
The Last Mystery of the Financial Crisis
Going Global 2013 - Internationalizing Your Assets - By Casey Research
340 Sheriffs Refuse To Enforce Unconstitutional Gun Control Laws
Free at Last! Detroit Stiffs the Municipal Unions.
Extortion, Police Raids and Secrecy: The Venezuelan Bitcoin Mining World
How to buy EU citizenship
Pentagon to Admit to 2,000 Ground Troops in Syria
Global terrorist organizations begin to respond to last week’s marijuana votes
When America Switched Sides In The War On Terror
'Footage of chemical attack in Syria is fraud'
PA Police Chief Seeks Nullification of Unconstitutional Gun Control
Police Officer Fired for Repeated Use of Taser on Senior With Alzheimer's
Visit the Wrong Website, and the FBI Could End Up in Your Computer