
“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
Related posts:
Additional $2.1M Seized from Mt. Gox Accounts – Now Over $5M Total
Even more smuggled gold enters India
Power vs. Market in California
N.H. State Rep Views Bitcoin As Legitimate Currency Competitor
Tiny California Towns Have Big Asset Forfeiture Histories
Judge Orders California DA To Return Family's Confiscated Life Savings
After the Silk Road Shut Down, Bitcoin Will Only Get Bigger
Why Clipperz is moving out of US
Marco Rubio Cites NATO Alliance: We Must Defend Turkey
If Nook goes bust, will your e-books survive?
Next Stop On The Road To Surveillance State: License Plate Scanners
Former LA County GOP chief arrested for sexting after mocking Weiner's candidacy
The Federal Reserve Has Been Given Police Powers, with Glock 22s and Patrol Cars
Monsanto Funded Anti-GMO Labeling Campaign Gets Away with Impersonating Govt. Agencies
American Entrepreneurship: Dead or Alive?