“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
The Real Revolution Has Nothing To Do With Donald Trump
Foreclosures are the Solution, Not the Problem
Jim Rogers: 'Run for the Hills' Now, I'm Doing It
Stop cheering – Quebec’s sovereignty movement is far from finished
Robert Mueller's forgotten surveillance crime spree
Eric Margolis: Syrian March To Disaster
The Left’s New Attack on Self Insurance: Obamacare Sleaze?
Trade Wars Mean the End of the Bull Market
‘Surgical Strikes’ an Orwellian Dream
Bill Bonner: Statistics show the fall of the US economy
An American Stasi
Ron Paul: Iraq, The 'Liberation' Neocons Would Rather Forget
Robots to Rule the World? Taking All Jobs? Replace Women?
Government Entrepreneurship Training?
7 Things I Am More Concerned About Than a Terrorist Attack
