“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
Retaining Their Freedom Is the Real Problem US Citizens Face
Andrew Sullivan Change Of Heart: 'Cameron Proves Greenwald Right'
Ron Paul: US Action in Mali is Another Undeclared War
Confiscation by the Installment Plan
Bill Bonner: The Fed Was Right…
PM Volatility Masks Impending Rise In Metals And Miners: Don't Sell Out
Bernanke's Plan...If He Identifies Bubbles
U.S. States Protect, Subsidize Bitcoin While Feds Moan About 'Terrorism' And 'Illicit Activity'
Bill Bonner: The Opportunity of a Lifetime – In Real Estate
Andrew Bacevich, The pretend war: why bombing Isil won't solve the problem
Mining Stocks: Fool’s Gold or Diamonds in the Rough?
Language—even profanity—evolves faster than it can be regulated
The President Punts in the Syrian War Game
Drones, Assassinations, and the Drug War
What Higher Mortgage Rates Mean in the Real World
