“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
The Deep State's Bogus 'Iranian Threat'
Ron Paul: Immigration 'Reform' Will Turn the US into a Police State
Farewell to Big Sister: Janet Napolitano’s Orwellian Legacy Lives On
Jamie Dimon Knows What You Don't Need to Know About U.S. Default
Ron Paul, Ferguson: The War Comes Home
Sanctions on Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Jordan?
Welcome to the United Soviet States of America
Fed's 'Elixir' Is Surely a Temporary One
Bill Bonner: Gold 2.0
100 to 115 SWAT raids per day in the US
Eric Margolis: Japan Must Face Up To China
Internet Sales Taxes Are Economy-Sapping Domestic Tariffs
Stossel: No Regulation? No Problem
NSA Snooping on Americans Is Unconstitutional and Outrageous
Herding the Sheeple into Government-Controlled Health Care