“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
Stop cheering – Quebec’s sovereignty movement is far from finished
Ron Paul on Obama's Syria WMD Claim
Bill Bonner: The End of the World As We Know It
It’s Time to Focus on the "School" in "School Shooting"
Foreclosures are the Solution, Not the Problem
Jim Rogers Interview with NewsMax TV 20 May 2013
Ron Paul: If You Like The Surveillance State, You’ll Love E-Verify
The FBI Is an Enemy of Freedom
Lindsey’s Plan for War on Iran
Daniel Hannan on Statism and Detroit: My Analysis
Portugal May Become the First of Europe’s Bankrupt Welfare States to Recover: Less Spending AND Lowe...
How To Play The Puerto Rican Economic Recovery
The Trillion Dollar Coin Is a Great Idea!
Andrew Napolitano: Can the President Legally Kill Americans?
Anthony Wile: The Danger Beyond Employment Numbers
