“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
Welcome to the Real World
An Ally Out of Control
You Can't Argue With a Sick Mind ...
Civil liberties may not survive the 'Gorgon Stare'
Bravo Britain
Trump’s Ten Lies: A Response to the Iran Nuclear Agreement Speech
Bill Bonner: The Massive Problem Threatening the Global Recovery
Bill Bonner: Will Japan's radical gamble work?
Jacob Hornberger: The Banality of Evil in the War on Drugs
How Do You Like Your Central Planners, Bookish or Flamboyant?
The Bureaucrats Will Scuttle Trump's Trillion-Dollar Infrastructure Boondoggle
Why You Hear Nothing About The West, Texas Firefighters
DNA's Trap for Investors: A Race to the Bottom
Drones, Assassinations, and the Drug War
Language—even profanity—evolves faster than it can be regulated
