“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
(Visited 34 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Obama’s Drones – Coming to a Window Near You
Ron Paul: Why The 2,776 NSA Violations Are No Big Deal
Should Drug-War Victims Pardon the Drug Warriors?
Money Laundering Is Financial Thoughtcrime
More Dark Side From The Empire
Travelers in the VIPR's Nest
Is America Going to Hell in a Handbasket?
Tax jurisdiction: Is space the final frontier?
J’ACCUSE … !
Bill Bonner: Is Bad News Good News for US Stocks?
Oil Goes Down, Bankruptcies Go Up
Trump has one thing right: our post-9/11 wars have been a mistake
US Media Shops North Korea, Russia 'Doomsday' Nuke Narratives
The UK Recovery that Isn't ... the Market Recovery that Is
The Real Surveillance Problem