“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
State Department: “We cannot make India look at you as an American”
Manning Show Trial Exposes the Fraud of Representative Democracy
Jim Rogers: 'I Suspect They’ll Take the Pension Plans Next; I'm Taking Preparations'
‘Make Trade, Not War’ is China’s daring plan in the Middle East
Obama’s Drones – Coming to a Window Near You
It’s official. America’s Suez moment has arrived
Ron Paul: Billion-Dollar Ukraine Aid Bill Is a Bad Deal For All
Marc Faber's response to price drop in Gold
Peter Schiff: Gold & The Perfect Storm That Will Lead To Collapse
The Fed Has Failed, Failed, Failed
Obama Meets Security Advisors Over "Most Specific, Credible Terrorist Threat In Years"; US Forces On...
Judge Napolitano: Can America bomb and kill for bragging rights?
Congrats grads! That’ll be $29,400
Understanding Gold Market Dynamics
Lew Rockwell: The US Corporate State
