“A sweeping set of changes to the New York City Police Department’s controversial ‘stop-and-frisk’ program has been put on hold. An appeals court stayed the changes, effectively postponing the operations of the monitor, while allowing police officers to continue using stop-and-frisk tactics. In a striking move, the court also took the unusual step of removing Scheindlin from the case, saying she had ‘ran afoul’ of the judiciary’s code of conduct and compromised the ‘appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation’ by granting media interviews while the case was pending before her.”
(Visited 37 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
School Offers Counseling for Students Troubled by Pastry-Gun Incident
Police Chief: Secret Service Told Us To Fake A Warrant
TSA removes X-ray body scanners from major airports
Global Markets Hitting All-Time Highs
Reality Check: VP Biden, "No law abiding citizens fears 2nd amendment infringement".
In-Person Bitcoin Exchanges Are Thriving
Are We Investing or Are We Just Dodging Thieves?
A Citizen Can Be Handcuffed And Driven To A Different Location But Still Not Be “Under Arrest”
Ben Swann Reality Check: Growing National Divide Over Guns and Gun Control
Vermont: Federal Lawsuit Challenges Bogus Traffic Stop, Lying Cop
Grid Down Acapulco: “There’s Nothing to Eat”
Iowa Judge Rescues Sioux City Speed Camera Program
BitPay Partners with 3dcart, Giving 16,000 Online Merchants the Ability to Accept Bitcoin
Merry Christmas: Congress Could Vote for an Online Sales Tax before the End of the Year
Christopher A Hartwell on Thailand and Bitcoin