“Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept. Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the ‘impact factor’, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack.”
Related posts:
China seizes $14.5 billion from family, associates of ex-security chief
As cities lay off police, frustrated neighborhoods turn to private cops
Venezuelans blocked from taking flights out by capital controls
Couple files civil lawsuit against former cop who stole their medication
Bitcoin on BBC Newsnight - 26/03/2013
WTC security failures prompt additional $60 million for contractors
Fidelity now allows clients to put bitcoins in IRAs
Officer charged with raping woman while on duty and in uniform
Former Camden cop sentenced to nearly 4 years for conspiracy
Iran to citizens: avoid U.S. travel due to ‘targeted Iranophobia’
Russia writes off 90% of Cuba's debt ahead of Putin L. America tour
Palestinian activist arrested for selling ‘Morsi perfume’
Paris women allowed to wear pants after two hundred year-old ban is lifted
The Winklevosses: Bitcoin worth 100 times more
Fraud from stolen bank cards highest since 2006