“Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept. Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the ‘impact factor’, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack.”
Related posts:
Facial Scanning Is Making Gains in Surveillance
Tax-free zones created around 8 NY colleges under Start-Up NY
Saudis ‘will not destroy the US shale industry’: hedge funds
Bitcoin Changes Hands At South Korean Bakery Franchise
Pakistan mobile networks suspended on security fears
Chinese expat author decides to move back to China after receiving green card
Antarctica once covered in palm trees, scientists discover
Cash-strapped Cyprus plots Russian exit from austerity
Capt. Joseph Hitner Of LAPD Removed In Probe Of Michelle Jordan's Rough Arrest
Leaked documents show massive expansion of CIA budget
Gold Deliveries From Shanghai Bourse Jump on Physical Demand
High taxes on legal pot in California could mean black market will thrive
Chinese Internet users hit 564 million in 2012
Bitcoin market price app, 'Bitcoin Alarm,' is carefully cloaked malware
Border Patrol ramps up New England checkpoints in 'Constitution-free zone'