“Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept. Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the ‘impact factor’, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack.”
Related posts:
Homeland Security asks Pentagon to house 12,000 migrant family members
AT&T paid for access to 4 billion call records a day for federal, local drug investigations
For some blacks, gun control raises echoes of segregated past
Kim Jong Un woos defectors: Come home. We won’t kill you … promise
Church of England declares war on payday loans firm
Crisis in Egypt: ‘We didn’t have space in the fridges for all the bodies’
A’s for Athletes, but Charges of Fraud at North Carolina
Will buying porn turn out to be bitcoin's killer app?
In one Florida county, nicotine is a banned drug
Iran Ruling In Europe Blocking Sanctions Draws Anger From U.S.
Stossel: Bitcoin revolution
Google ordered to obey FBI’s warrantless data requests
Maryland 'rain tax' to be enforced through satellite surveillance?
A Ron Paul coin?
Airbus patents plane that could fly from Paris to Tokyo in three hours