“Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept. Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the ‘impact factor’, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack.”
Related posts:
Barack Obama’s ‘extreme’ anti-terror tactics face liberal backlash
Federal judge: ‘Clipping’ news articles violates copyright law
65% See Gun Rights As Protection Against Tyranny
As marijuana goes legit, investors rush in
IRS Backs Down: Michigan Forfeiture Cases Voluntarily Dismissed
WikiLeaks staffer helping Edward Snowden flee U.S. authorities
Bitcoin: the fastest growing currency in the world
Liechtenstein for hire at $70,000 a night [2011]
Defense industry consultants advise Arab nations on crowd control products
For sale: Systems to secretly track cellphone users around the globe
Bitcoin: Understated benefits and overstated risks
6% Treasury yields? May come sooner than you think
Should anyone own parts of the moon?
Kim Dotcom poised for return with Megaupload successor
Genetic modification blamed for rejected Washington alfalfa crop