“Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept. Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the ‘impact factor’, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack.”
Related posts:
Australian Central Bank Cuts Key Rate to Record-Low 2.75%
Monsanto, steaks, and chefs: Intellectual property and food
Deputy charged with pepper spraying teen's pizza during traffic stop
Airliner diverted as secure cockpit door locks pilot out mid-flight
Top general: U.S. still has key Iraq role even after troop exit
India's third biggest gold fund reopens to investors
Forget cursive: Teach kids how to code
India Bans Bitcoin But Embraces Blockchain
Cyprus bank controls to last a month, minister says
Phishers Divert Home Loan Earnest Money By Altering E-mails
Post Office to release fashion line
Former police officer indicted for stealing $13,000 in DARE donations
Seemingly terrific April jobs report poses strange puzzle
U. of California extends smoking ban to e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco
Florida woman arrested for riding an endangered manatee