
“A federal judge who endorsed ‘suspicion-less’ searches of laptops, cameras and cell phones at the border has set up a possible Supreme Court showdown challenging what critics call ‘Constitution-free zones’ and the Obama administration’s dragnet approach to national security. A decision by Judge Edward Korman upholding the federal government’s right to search travelers’ electronic devices at or near the border conflicts with a similar ruling in California. That ruling requires a ‘reasonable suspicion’ of criminal activity before agents can confiscate and examine personal photos, laptops and files. Korman’s ruling does not.”
Related posts:
Social Security Trust Fund’s Fall Is First Since 1983
Help Thy Neighbor and Go Straight to Prison
Twitter CEO defends ‘principled’ data gathering policy
Judge orders trial in allegedly missing Oklahoma City bombing video case
Apple becomes most valuable company in history
'Being anxious and afraid does not justify attempting to execute a man'
Hong Kong relents on patriotism classes on poll eve
Special operations armored vehicle pulls over driver who flipped the bird
European central banks mull bolder moves to prevent low inflation
Former Portland Sex Offender Bureau officer pleads guilty to receipt of child pornography
The £240million private jet with a Turkish bath, boardroom and concert hall
Hospital technician pleads guilty to leaving dirty needles after feeding his painkiller addiction
The cost to replace the 59 Tomahawk missiles Trump fired on Syria
Fugitive Chris Dorner against the LAPD: ‘He knows what he’s doing. We trained him’
Plainclothes deputy in unmarked car pulls gun; 5 officers attack and tase brothers