“The case was McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). The legal issue: Could the state of Maryland tax the Second Bank of the United States? It was a private bank. The issue, as stated by Chief Justice Marshall in a long, detailed decision, was this: Does the Constitution allow Congress to charter a bank? That was what Congress did in 1791: the [First] Bank of the United States. It was a central bank. Its charter lapsed in 1811. The Second Bank of the United States was chartered by Congress in 1816. In 1818, Maryland voted to tax the Bank. The Bank refused to pay. The Supreme Court decided in favor of McCulloch, an agent of the Bank.”
http://www.garynorth.com/public/12007.cfm
(Visited 20 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The “Chechen Connection”, Al Qaeda and the Boston Marathon Bombings
Karl Hess: Tools to Dismantle the State
Why the Status Quo Is Doomed
Neofeudalism's Tax Donkeys and the Battle for Control of Resources
The Future Is Unimaginably Better than Expected
A Story of Slavery in Modern America
The Death of Privacy
Will Grigg: Prison Profiteers
U.S. Prisons Thriving on Jim Crow Marijuana Arrests
Robert Ringer: A Tale of Two Winners
The Daily Bell - Investment Trends 2014
“But there is no inflation!” – Misconceptions about the debasement of money
Wendy McElroy: Measuring the Extent of a Police State
Bill Bonner: Preparing to Fail
Schedule 7 and the detention of David Miranda