“The case was McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). The legal issue: Could the state of Maryland tax the Second Bank of the United States? It was a private bank. The issue, as stated by Chief Justice Marshall in a long, detailed decision, was this: Does the Constitution allow Congress to charter a bank? That was what Congress did in 1791: the [First] Bank of the United States. It was a central bank. Its charter lapsed in 1811. The Second Bank of the United States was chartered by Congress in 1816. In 1818, Maryland voted to tax the Bank. The Bank refused to pay. The Supreme Court decided in favor of McCulloch, an agent of the Bank.”
http://www.garynorth.com/public/12007.cfm
Related posts:
The Great Deception, Part II
IRS Reporting Rules for Cash Transactions and Precious Metals
Tyler Winklevoss: Digital Darwinism
Identity Theft, Credit Reports, and You
Nazi gold and currency wars - A full guide
John Hussman: The Bubble Right In Front Of Our Faces
Economic Darwinism and the Next Financial Crisis
In Gold We Trust 2014
New York’s Crony Motivated Swipe Against the Sharing Economy
Bill Bonner: Capitalism and Sex Slavery
Not Your Father's Stock Market Anymore
The Worst Inflation in My Lifetime
The Fiscal Cliff's Structural Endgame
“Cruel and Unusual” Is the Only Way to Describe It
Is the Gold Market Manipulated?
