“In the spring of 1863, California created a law that allowed any business contract to identify the kind of money or currency to be used in the fulfillment of the contract. If the contract required payment in gold, for example, then only a gold payment fulfilled the contract. In the other states, greenbacks could be a substitute for gold or silver payments. By the time McCulloch was appointed treasury secretary, just 37 months after the Legal Tender Act, greenbacks were worth less than half of their original value. California’s hesitancy to use these demand notes as an equal exchange for gold was proving wise.”
Related posts:
Detlev Schlichter: ‘Positive Money’ and the fallacy of the need for a state money producer
The Ultimate Privacy Protection: Foreign Real Estate
Eric Margolis: Korea, One Of The World's Five Most Strategic Nations
An Important Weimar Republic History Lesson
James Bovard: Hey, wait a minute, Trump's fear-mongering isn't new
The First Step to a Free Detroit: Let Them Work
Ten Things to Expect from Obamacare in 2014
Sitka Pacific Strategy Letter, August 2013
Robert Ringer: A Tale of Two Winners
How Did Americans Survive Until 1892 Without the Pledge of Allegiance?
The Politics Of Bitcoin Mixing Services
Seth Klarman On "Born Bulls", Bitcoin, & "The Truman Show" Market
How to Avoid Second Passport Scams and Traps
Is the Gold Market Manipulated?
What If Stocks, Bonds and Housing All Go Down Together?