“A Massachusetts woman faces charges of allegedly using a hidden mobile phone to audio-record her own suspicion-of-disorderly-conduct arrest. When police inventoried her purse, they said they found a mobile phone secretly recording the incident, allegedly in violation of state wiretapping regulations. Under Massachusetts law, people may record police officers in public places, but only if the officers are aware that a recording is taking place, according to case law. In 2011, a federal appeals court ruled that a Boston woman openly filming police activity had her constitutional rights violated when she was arrested for filming an arrest of somebody else.”
Related posts:
Boston's Progressives: We Support Our "Voluntary" Police State
Richard Retting, 'Father Of Red Light Cameras In America', Becomes A Paid Camera Lobbyist
Russia urges Syria hand over chemical weapons to int'l control
Glenn Beck calls for celebrating Ramadan by shooting all Guantanamo prisoners in the head
Disabled Vet Labeled “Terrorist” For Investigating Cost Of Surveillance Cameras
To Be A Domestic Terrorist, Set Animals Free
Will the new gold iPhone lead to an unexpected windfall for Apple in China and India?
Defensive Interposition against Police Aggression
6 year old expelled over toy gun allowed back into school
IRS: You Can’t Sue Us Unless We Say You Can
The Canadian Border Fence Is the Climax of Isolationism
Why You Shouldn’t Write Off BitCoin Just Yet
San Diego company cashing in on virtual currency
Charles Burris: Demonizing Putin Campaign Continues
Adventures in Legal Land with Marc Stevens (2004)