“A Massachusetts woman faces charges of allegedly using a hidden mobile phone to audio-record her own suspicion-of-disorderly-conduct arrest. When police inventoried her purse, they said they found a mobile phone secretly recording the incident, allegedly in violation of state wiretapping regulations. Under Massachusetts law, people may record police officers in public places, but only if the officers are aware that a recording is taking place, according to case law. In 2011, a federal appeals court ruled that a Boston woman openly filming police activity had her constitutional rights violated when she was arrested for filming an arrest of somebody else.”
Related posts:
Reality Check: One question Sec. of State Clinton was not asked about Benghazi
Police and school staff sued for beating and Tasering 12-year-old deaf boy
LBMA: Volume Of Gold Transferred Climbs To 12-Year High In May On ETF Redemptions
The FDA: A Pain From the Neck to the Big Toe
Treasury Caught Illegally Spying On Americans’ Financial Records
$21 million later, London police stop waiting out Assange at embassy
White House leans on industry for bottled water push
Obama delivers ‘full-throated defense’ of Larry Summers to House Democrats
Will Freedom to Remove Eyebrow Hair Make Texas a “Dangerous” Place?
Then They Came For the Prosecutors....
"Due To Popular Demand" Goldman Starts Covering Bitcoin
Court Eases Prosecutors’ Burden of Proof in Leak Cases
Audit Findings: State Lab Lies About Blood Alcohol Levels
State Dept. whistleblower’s lawyers targeted by ‘Watergate-style’ break-ins
International Wire Fees going up from the new remittance transfer rule