
“It is the nature of authority to equate dissent with wrongdoing, or at least with a threat. The record is suffused with examples of groups and individuals being placed under government surveillance by virtue of their dissenting views and activism – Martin Luther King, the civil rights movement, anti-war activists, environmentalists. In the eyes of the government and J Edgar Hoover’s FBI, they were all ‘doing something wrong’: political activity that threatened the prevailing order. The opportunity those in power have to characterise political opponents as ‘national security threats’ or even ‘terrorists’ has repeatedly proven irresistible.”
Related posts:
The Death of Privacy
Investors, Run for Cover From the Incoming ‘Taper Bomb’
What Bitcoin investors are funding?
My life as a tyrant
The Grand Experiment: Offloading Risk onto the State
Precious Metals Power Summit 2013
Decentralizing Science: Local Biohacking
The Chart of the Century
The Future of Countries
How Bad Can Things Get?
Dancing on the Grave of the Keynesian System
The 7 Choices Left to the Military-Industrial Complex
Ten Reasons the U.S. Is No Longer the Land of the Free
Why the Status Quo Is Doomed
Obama reveals himself as a champion of the surveillance state