
“It is the nature of authority to equate dissent with wrongdoing, or at least with a threat. The record is suffused with examples of groups and individuals being placed under government surveillance by virtue of their dissenting views and activism – Martin Luther King, the civil rights movement, anti-war activists, environmentalists. In the eyes of the government and J Edgar Hoover’s FBI, they were all ‘doing something wrong’: political activity that threatened the prevailing order. The opportunity those in power have to characterise political opponents as ‘national security threats’ or even ‘terrorists’ has repeatedly proven irresistible.”
Related posts:
Charles Goyette: Government vs. Prosperity (Chapter 1, Abridged)
Why So Much Faith in Supreme Court Justices?
"The Bank Was Saved, and the People Were Ruined."
Roger Ver: Why Bitcoin is Important for the World
Identity Theft, Credit Reports, and You
Psychopathic Kyriarchy – Our Rulers Really Are Unempathic Predators
The 7 Choices Left to the Military-Industrial Complex
Arriving in Slovakia in November of 1989
Hold US Policymakers to Their Abysmal Record on Foreign Meddling
Civil war is the price Afghans will pay for the criminals the West installed
10 Reasons Why You Have to Quit Your Job This Year
Yellen: How High Is Up?
Pelosi: Willing to "Protect" Syrian Children To Death
Law professor: Should 3rd Amendment prevent government spying?
An Expatriate's View of Vietnam