“Strengthening copper prices, for example, do not immediately result in increased copper production in many market cycles, because the production cycle requires new deposits to be discovered, financed, and constructed—a process that can consume a decade. Price declines—even declines below the industry’s total production costs—do not immediately cause massive production cuts. The ‘sunk capital’ involved in discovery and construction of mining projects and attendant infrastructure (such as smelters, railways, and ports) causes the industry to produce down to, and sometimes below, their cash costs of production.”
http://www.caseyresearch.com/articles/why-the-resource-supercycle-is-still-intact
Related posts:
Will Grigg: Living in Amerika
Jeffrey Tucker: Why We Love "The Nutcracker"
The IRS is Coming After the Little Guys
John Hussman: The Two Pillars of Full-Cycle Investing
About That Supposed Correlation of the U.S. Dollar and Gold....
Murray Rothbard: And Now Afghanistan [1980]
Fred Reed: The Eye of Sauron
Let’s stop wrecking lives over a bag of weed
Anthony Gregory: The Habeas Corpus Myth
How an Online Business Can Help You Internationalize
Fifteen Benefits of the War on Drugs
David Galland: The New Stoics
Could You Be Arrested For Offering A Lyft?
Singapore: A Case of Libertarian Orientalism?
Note to Fed: Giving the Banks Free Money Won't Make Us Hire More Workers