“I was put up for early promotion to full professor in about 1975, a few years after Marihuana Reconsidered came out. My chief, who had put me up for early full professorship, was on the promotions committee. He came back from the promotions committee meeting and asked me to come to his office to give me the bad news. They had turned me down. When I asked him why he said, ‘Well, they loved your work on schizophrenia, but Marihuana Reconsidered – they hated that.’ I asked why. He said, ‘They said it was too controversial. [..]’ I said, ‘What has controversy got to do with it? We’re in the academy. Isn’t scholarship the criterion, or one of the most important?'”
Related posts:
Peter Schiff: Soon in America, retirement will be as rare as a single income household
Never Forget 9/11... And Never Stop Asking What It Really Was
Bipolar Silver: How to Profit
The Devil's Chessboard: How the First CIA Director Collaborated With Nazis
Will Grigg: Why is it a “Crime” to Disarm a Uniformed Aggressor?
Two Chess Moves Away from Capital Controls
Bill Bonner: Preparing to Fail
The Road to the Permanent Warfare State, Part 13
Indian central bank has debased the rupee 99% vs the dollar; no hope in next Guv too
Breaking the last taboo - Gaza and the threat of world war
Is Size Overrated?
IRS Reporting Rules for Cash Transactions and Precious Metals
Why Centralization Leads to Collapse
Wendy McElroy: Only Places Have Rights?
Anthony Gregory: Obama’s Persecution of Bradley Manning