
“I was put up for early promotion to full professor in about 1975, a few years after Marihuana Reconsidered came out. My chief, who had put me up for early full professorship, was on the promotions committee. He came back from the promotions committee meeting and asked me to come to his office to give me the bad news. They had turned me down. When I asked him why he said, ‘Well, they loved your work on schizophrenia, but Marihuana Reconsidered – they hated that.’ I asked why. He said, ‘They said it was too controversial. [..]’ I said, ‘What has controversy got to do with it? We’re in the academy. Isn’t scholarship the criterion, or one of the most important?'”
Related posts:
The Rise of the Antiwar Libertarian Republicans
David Galland: How to Tell if You Live in a Police State
Will Grigg: Living in Amerika
Poor Training Of Narcotics Officers Contributes To Culture Of Ignorance
Reevaluating Drug Courts: No Mother Should Have to Go Through What I Did
Political Savvy of Osama Bin Laden vs. US Foreign Policy Establishment
America's Emerging Police State: A Brief History
Henry Magee, John Quinn, and the "Right of Resistance"
Detlev Schlichter: Good riddance to deposit ‘insurance’
Three Cheers for the Red, White, and Blue
Fred Reed: Terrorism in Boston
Why I Charge $1,000 For An Hour Of My Time
The Overworked and the Idle
Will Grigg: The Stalinist in the White House
Obama's False History of Public 'Infrastructure' Investment