
“I was put up for early promotion to full professor in about 1975, a few years after Marihuana Reconsidered came out. My chief, who had put me up for early full professorship, was on the promotions committee. He came back from the promotions committee meeting and asked me to come to his office to give me the bad news. They had turned me down. When I asked him why he said, ‘Well, they loved your work on schizophrenia, but Marihuana Reconsidered – they hated that.’ I asked why. He said, ‘They said it was too controversial. [..]’ I said, ‘What has controversy got to do with it? We’re in the academy. Isn’t scholarship the criterion, or one of the most important?'”
Related posts:
Why I Bought One Bitcoin
Marc Faber on Commodity Cycles and the Wealth Redistribution Craze
Why the Resource Supercycle Is Still Intact
War Becomes Perpetual When It Is Used As Rationale For Peace
David Stockman, Christmas 2015—–Why There Is No Peace On Earth
Aggressive Police Tactics Threaten Innocent Citizens
Michael Scheuer: Obama & Brennan - A new American-killing “Murder Inc”?
Sheriff Bradshaw and the Palm Beach County Psihuska
The Rise of the Antiwar Libertarian Republicans
Debt Excess and the Liquidation Process in a Historical Context
Casey's Louis James Warns: 'Don't Try to Time the Market'
Government Eyes Are Watching You
The Pentagon, CIA, and NSA Are in Charge
You Are an Anarchist. The Question Is How Often?
Publishing Atrocity: The 1963 Edition of Human Action