
“I was put up for early promotion to full professor in about 1975, a few years after Marihuana Reconsidered came out. My chief, who had put me up for early full professorship, was on the promotions committee. He came back from the promotions committee meeting and asked me to come to his office to give me the bad news. They had turned me down. When I asked him why he said, ‘Well, they loved your work on schizophrenia, but Marihuana Reconsidered – they hated that.’ I asked why. He said, ‘They said it was too controversial. [..]’ I said, ‘What has controversy got to do with it? We’re in the academy. Isn’t scholarship the criterion, or one of the most important?'”
Related posts:
Who Are the Real Anarchists?
“Why I Set Up an Offshore Company”
"Free Trade Has Destroyed American Manufacturing": False.
Thoughts Have Consequences
Walter Williams: Why Aren't Murderous Communists Condemned Like Nazis Are?
Canada’s ban on e-cigarettes makes no sense
The Suicide of Communism: The Case for Patience
A (Brief) People’s History of Gun Control
Neocon think tank next to call out racist, pro-war roots of War on Drugs
Glenn Greenwald at Yale Law School: "With Liberty and Justice for Some"
The Top 6 Reasons Why Everyone Needs a Second Passport
Penning the Sheep for a Shearing—Capital Controls, Part 1
David Galland: The True Import of the Boston Bombings
My History With the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC)
Free Staters Tell Concord Police: Tanks, But No Tanks