“I was put up for early promotion to full professor in about 1975, a few years after Marihuana Reconsidered came out. My chief, who had put me up for early full professorship, was on the promotions committee. He came back from the promotions committee meeting and asked me to come to his office to give me the bad news. They had turned me down. When I asked him why he said, ‘Well, they loved your work on schizophrenia, but Marihuana Reconsidered – they hated that.’ I asked why. He said, ‘They said it was too controversial. [..]’ I said, ‘What has controversy got to do with it? We’re in the academy. Isn’t scholarship the criterion, or one of the most important?'”
(Visited 25 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The True Story Behind 300 and Sparta's "Super Soldiers"
Everything that’s Wrong with the Tax System, in a Single Picture
Top 10 Reasons Why the Mafia is Better than the State
The Grand Experiment: Offloading Risk onto the State
Bill Bonner: How to Disappear Without a Trace
Will Grigg: "No Hesitation"
Is Your Out-of-State LLC “Doing Business” in California?
Gary North: How Come We're So Rich?
David Stockman, Christmas 2015—–Why There Is No Peace On Earth
Ron Paul: Internet Sales Tax Could Crush Small Businesses
Surveillance Self-Defense International [2010]
What Uber Can Teach Us About American Government
The $4 Trillion Money Printing Press
Losing Velocity: QE and the Massive Speculative Carry Trade
Eric Margolis: Syria's WMD?