
“The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Tuesday that the Constitution forbids police from holding a suspect without probable cause, even for fewer than 10 extra minutes. Writing on behalf of the court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg declared that the constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure prevent police from extending an otherwise completed traffic stop to allow for a drug-sniffing dog to arrive. According to the Supreme Court, while officers may use a dog to sniff around a car during the course of a routine traffic stop, they cannot extend the length of the stop in order to carry it out.”
Related posts:
Here Are 15 Countries With No Income Taxes Whatsoever
$4.1m goes missing as Chinese bitcoin trading platform GBL vanishes
Republican Lawmakers Urge Obama To Use ‘Combatant Status’ For Bombing Suspect
Syria crisis: Moscow reminds US of Iraq mistakes
Burrito Company Offers Bond Giving Investors A Free Burrito Every Week
The DEA's $4 Billion Warrantless Cash Grab
Reality of Egypt – Not What You Think?
Return Airport Security To The Airlines
Unusual Cremation Not Limited to Michael Hastings
DOE Green Energy Loans: $11.45 million per job and a rounding error’s worth of averted carbon emissi...
Why it’s the Year of the Snake
Offshore Jurisdiction Review: Malta
Study: Drugged Driving Laws Have Little Or No Impact On Traffic Deaths
Ex-cop who ‘beat the s–t out of’ jaywalk suspect charged with assault
A different world