“Forrest’s draconian sentence isn’t even serving to dissuade Silk Road-type competitors from continuing the same type of operation that Ulbricht was operating. Heck, Ulbricht’s competitors and new potential competitors might well be ecstatic that Forrest has removed Ulbricht as a competitor. What all too many federal officials, including federal judges, have is a notable lack of understanding about economic principles. Maybe that’s because economics is not taught in law school. If they had such an understanding, they would understand that the more they crack down in the drug war, the worse the problem becomes.”
http://fff.org/2015/06/04/wrong-message-ulbricht-case/
Related posts:
How to stop the FBI from reading your email
NSA spying illegal, even under the unconstitutional Patriot Act
Stop cheering – Quebec’s sovereignty movement is far from finished
Jacob Hornberger: More Judicial Deference on National-Security State Murder
2009 Promise of Cheaper Health Care Has Morphed Into 2013 Price Hikes
..And Then Government Came For The Toddlers
Cyprus: Cause They Can
Ron Paul: Should We Be Shocked At Government Spying?
An Anti-Semitic American Law Created the State of Israel, and a Whole Lot of Trouble
Thanks, Bloomberg, for More Nonsense About Gold
Bill Bonner: A New American Century?
Are American taxpayers financially responsible to defend Syrians?
Point-By-Point Rebuttal of U.S. Case for War In Syria
Bill Bonner: The Fed Was Right…
Expatriation - Everyone's Doing it, Maybe You Should Too
