
“The Prime Minister first indicated that he would try and clamp down on secure communications that could not be decrypted by law enforcement even with a warrant back in January, in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo shootings in Paris. His comments sparked an immediate flurry of condemnation from privacy and security activists, but his recent statements show he’s not backing down. (Number 10 has not responded to requests for clarification about Cameron’s comments.) Business Insider reached out to Bruce Schneier to discuss the feasibility of Cameron’ proposed ban on ‘safe spaces’ online. Schneier didn’t hold back.”
Related posts:
A Western Alternative to the West
Public Schools Give Kids Attention Deficit Disorder.
New tax to fund Obamacare could leave American expats in Canada owing Uncle Sam
Tunisia: financial offshore centre
James Corbett: What I Learned From the "PropOrNot" Propaganda List
What Ben Bernanke Will Do When the Accelerated Price Inflation Hits
Allegheny Airlines Has the Last Laugh. “Thanks, Uncle Sam!”
Why doctors are more dangerous than guns
Lobbyist: Use Drones to 'Zap' Americans on U.S. Soil
You’re infected—if you want to see your data again, pay us $300
'Suspiciously simple strategy' of “best performing hedge fund in history”
Pat Buchanan: What Is America’s Mission Now?
Why Silicon Valley (and Google) Loves Bitcoin
Government's definition of 'terrorist' encompasses practically everyone
'Fake' Reform: Little to Celebrate as USA Freedom Act Passes House