“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Bitcoiniacs Bitcoin Store Opens In Vancouver
Experts: Syria attack could escalate violence and further destabilize region
Pot Grower Demands Speedy Trial, Is Imprisoned For 6 Years Without Trial
This Group May Stop the NSA From Tapping the Internet’s Backbone
Secession and Nullification in Colorado
Study Reveals Mushrooms Cure Depression By Not Being Anti-Depressants
Cops Find Less than 1 Oz of Weed at a Party, Throw Over 70 People in Jail
The War On Cash Ratchets Up In Greece With “Soft” Cash Ban
$5.25 Million For Senate Hair Care; Politicians Living The High Life
Trump endorses 25-cent gas tax hike, lawmakers say
Chaos on the Convention Floor as RNC Blocks Ron Paul Delegates, Alters Seating Rules
Boy, 12, Fined For WWII Vet Fundraising Efforts
Gold Stocks 101 (10 Gold Stocks Not To Own)
Revoke Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize
JPMorgan: $7 Billion In "Fines" In Just The Past Two Years