
“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Chuck Norris shuts down wannabe Bitcoin with just his fingers
Imran Hussain on Frontier Investing and the UAE Tax-Free Zone
Military-Industrial Complex Presstitutes Get SMACKED DOWN By A Real Journalist
Alan Grayson on Syria strike: Military-industrial complex wants it, Americans don’t
Ukraine’s Gold Reserves Secretly Flown Out by the New York Fed?
Financial Considerations for Expats
Reality of Egypt – Not What You Think?
IRS Seized $17 Million From Innocent Business Owners Using Asset Forfeiture
Feds May Cut Off Water For Legal Marijuana Crops
Should We Really Put Gold in an IRA?
Default SSH Key Found in Many Cisco Security Appliances
25 Facts About The Fall Of Detroit That Will Leave You Shaking Your Head
Google Acquires Titan Aerospace, High-Altitude Drone Startup
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano resigning to lead Univ. of California
Watch Iran's $40-Million Oil Rig Collapse Into The Sea