
“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Dear brands: stop remembering 9/11
South African rand crashes as 'affirmative action' mining charter introduced
Greek Island Trials Digital Currency Solution to Boost Economy
My 3 Cents On Cancer: Jack Andraka at TEDxSanJoseCAWomen
EU Easing to Infinity and Beyond?
Facebook's Free Basics Banned In India, Now Shuts Down in Egypt
10 Climate Myths Busted (in 60 seconds!)
State Regulators Force Vermont's Only Bitcoin ATM Offline
Who Built the Syrian Electronic Army?
Happy New Year 2018 from Liberland
What We Saw at the Lemonade & Raw Milk Freedom Day
Steve Beauregard CEO of GoCoin on Bitcoin and Starting Up in Singapore
Study reveals GMO corn to be highly toxic
‘No plans to leave Russia’: Snowden has job offer, awaits reunion with family, girlfriend
Leukemia sufferer Bob Crouse sues city over destroyed marijuana