
“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Judge Sentenced to 28 Years in Prison for "Selling" Kids to Private Prisons
Did Saudi Arabia murder American citizens? Redacted doc could answer
The Best Way to Profit From Private-Equity Crowdfunding
The End of the Tea Party
E-Driver's Licenses Enable Round-the-Clock Surveillance
Massive security hole lets hackers control millions of cameras, printers and routers
Deutsche Bank's Layoff Statement: Lower Compensation To Come
LBMA, IGE urged to end Iran-Turkey Gold trade
Worst. Retirement. Option. Ever.
Missouri lawmaker wants ‘personal exemption’ from Obamacare birth control mandate
Warriors news: Will Golden State accept Bitcoin next?
Dutch SNS Bank Fails On Real Estate Losses: First "Too Big To Fail" Nationalization In Five Years
Pentagon plans to fight ‘War on Terror’ for another 20 years
Miss Utah contestant charged with making and throwing homemade bombs
Strangled By Red Tape