
“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Government-Approved Workouts? The Fight Against Fitness Licensing.
Housing…”For-Sale” Supply Wave Hitting Market?
Over 50% Of Electric Cars Sold In US Are In 5 Cities
Real estate developer wants to sell his $7.85 million mansion in Bitcoin
Hong Kong 2012 net gold flow to China hit record high
Scientists Take Graphene to the Next Level
Bitcoin takes off — on the ground in Berlin
Swiss Gold Initiative Likely Tighter Than Polls Suggest
The Greatest Opportunity in 30 Years
Why I REALLY Moved to Puerto Rico, and You Should Too
Mom Arrested for Letting Kid Play in Lego Store While She Shopped
Millions, possibly billions of dollars awarded to scientists for duplicate studies
500 Years Shows that Mass Spying Always Aims at Crushing Dissent
"Most people are yet to understand how disruptive [Bitcoin] is."
6 Whopping Government Misstatements About NSA Spying