
“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Men Deemed 'Too Handsome' Deported from Saudi Arabia
Life in the Emerging American Police State: What’s in Store for 2014?
'We can no longer afford to be American citizens'
St. Louis Federal Reserve Suffers DNS Breach
A Government That Gives Licenses Won't Hesitate to Take Them Away
On This Day in 1933
#DNCLeaks 'disappears' from trending news as WikiLeaks emails released
Zimmerman can get his gun back, has ‘even more reason’ to carry now
13,000 Military War Vehicles Up for Grabs to Local Police Forces?
Is War Part of a Wall Street Party?
Mother charged with baby's murder over prescription drug-laced breast milk
A Silver Lining to Obummercare
Survey: Investor Optimism Highest Since Crash of '87
Louisiana Drug Lifer Struggles For Freedom... Someday
Americans Rejecting Mainstream Media for British Newspaper