
“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Pat Buchanan: Chemical Attack 'Reeks Of False Flag Operation'
Did Goldman Sachs Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?
CoinSeed Invests $5 Million in BitFury Bitcoin Mining Hardware
Corporations Join Increasing Numbers Renouncing US Citizenship
TSA Releases Data on Air Marshal Misconduct -- 7 Years After Request
A life sentence … for pot?
Should You Be Able to Buy Food Directly From Farmers? Regulators Don't Think So
Lenders will target near-equity squatters for future foreclosures
PGP inventor and Silent Circle co-founder Phil Zimmermann on the surveillance society
Fastest-Growing Jobs Pay Under $10/Hour
Chinese Central Bank Official: We Don’t Want to Suppress Bitcoin
Can New UK Health Czar Cure NHS's 'Enormous Sickness'?
NSA Helped British Spies Find Security Holes In Juniper Firewalls
Obamacare tax on unearned income cannot be offset by foreign tax credits
Beaten, Thrown in Solitary After Calling 911 To Help Crashed Bicyclist