
“What many people do not know is that the plan could have been finished without destroying many of the homes that were ultimately seized through eminent domain. Pfizer executives, however, said that they didn’t want their beautiful headquarters ‘surrounded by tenements.’ Think about that. A large corporation was going to receive a gigantic gift, but still felt empowered to demand that people whose homes could have been preserved must nevertheless be forced out because, as the president of NLDC put it, their houses looked ‘ugly and dumb.’ Thus we see one of the hidden consequences of eminent domain – it engenders a domineering, elitist attitude.”
Related posts:
Yellen: How High Is Up?
Jeffrey Tucker: How the Internet Saved Civilization
Gold: It’s Time to Buy
Aggressive Police Tactics Threaten Innocent Citizens
Stefan Molyneux: The Truth About How The US Will Save Syria
President Trump’s ‘Friends’ in Saudi Arabia
A $100k earner gets to keep $99k in Singapore but $57k in San Francisco
Better “Safe Haven” – Switzerland or Canada?
Rulership's Last Stand: Is the Government Out to Eat You?
Can You Pass The Terrorism Quiz? (Updated June 2013)
Ron Paul’s victory over Bernanke and the Federal Reserve
The Deep State or Invisible Government: A Brief Bibliographic Retrospective
Wendy McElroy: The Most Influential Man You Haven't Heard Of
Why the Media is Desperate to Reclaim its “Gatekeeper” Status for News
Is 'La Vie En Rose' Over For France?