
“What many people do not know is that the plan could have been finished without destroying many of the homes that were ultimately seized through eminent domain. Pfizer executives, however, said that they didn’t want their beautiful headquarters ‘surrounded by tenements.’ Think about that. A large corporation was going to receive a gigantic gift, but still felt empowered to demand that people whose homes could have been preserved must nevertheless be forced out because, as the president of NLDC put it, their houses looked ‘ugly and dumb.’ Thus we see one of the hidden consequences of eminent domain – it engenders a domineering, elitist attitude.”
Related posts:
Better “Safe Haven” – Switzerland or Canada?
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics... at FreedomFest
Bill Bonner: The world’s fattest army
Robert Ringer: When Not to Save Money
How to Use Public Health to Control Everything
BEARCAT Bread And Circuses, Or Why I Ripped Up My Ticket
CIA created 9/11 blowback, American citizens paid
John Hussman: On the Completion of the Current Market Cycle and Beyond
When Zero’s Too High: Time preference versus central bankers
John Hussman: Psychological Whiplash
Bitcoin, Encryption, Drug Use, and the FBI's Own Bitcoin Wallet
Cuba's Past Could Be Your Future
What Bitcoin investors are funding?
Detlev Schlichter: The triumph of politics
Michael Scheuer: Obama & Brennan - A new American-killing “Murder Inc”?