
“What many people do not know is that the plan could have been finished without destroying many of the homes that were ultimately seized through eminent domain. Pfizer executives, however, said that they didn’t want their beautiful headquarters ‘surrounded by tenements.’ Think about that. A large corporation was going to receive a gigantic gift, but still felt empowered to demand that people whose homes could have been preserved must nevertheless be forced out because, as the president of NLDC put it, their houses looked ‘ugly and dumb.’ Thus we see one of the hidden consequences of eminent domain – it engenders a domineering, elitist attitude.”
Related posts:
David Graeber, DEBT: The First 5,000 Years [2012]
A $100k earner gets to keep $99k in Singapore but $57k in San Francisco
Everything that’s Wrong with the Tax System, in a Single Picture
India: Emerging from Poverty or Stuck in the Past?
Mises Explains the Drug War
Money Will Be Digital — But Will It Be Free?
Bill Bonner: How to Survive the Coming Zombie Apocalypse, Part 1
Homeland Security Is A Racket Twice Over
How to Spot a Market Top
10 Geniuses Who Used Drugs -- And Their Drugs of Choice
So you want to invent your own currency
Walter Williams: Why Aren't Murderous Communists Condemned Like Nazis Are?
Central Bankers' Nightmare: Goldman Sachs Might Go Bust
The Road to the Permanent Warfare State, Part 13
Easy Test to Separate Winners from Wasters