
“Recently, Congress, the administration, and pundits have not been shy about threatening to use material support against social media companies like Twitter. Wittes and Bedell reason, it’s not a great leap to see how a judge would find Apple equally guilty. Apple would violate the law, the two write, if it continued to provide its encrypted services to a customer after the FBI has served a warrant for the customers’ communications. Wittes and Bedell argue that ‘the sale of an encrypted phone by a major company to the general public cannot plausibly constitute material support for terrorism.’ We’re not so sure.”
http://www.defendingdissent.org/now/news/shapeshifting-material-support-apple/
Related posts:
The tepid mainstream “defenses” of Aaron Swartz
Chickenpox (Varicella) Vaccine: This Is Why a Shingles Epidemic is Bolting Straight at the U.S.
Don't Privatize the Afghan War—Just End It
Cannabis for Elders: A Precarious State
America’s Corporate Tax System Ranks a Miserable 94 out of 100 Nations in “Tax Attractiveness”
California gets face scanners to spy on everyone at once
The Arbitrary Diktats of Generalissimo Obama
Doug Casey on the America That Was – Now the United (Police) State of America
You’re infected—if you want to see your data again, pay us $300
The Curiously Uncurious Ben Bernanke
Should it be illegal to criticize a Congressman?
WikiLeaks: Snowden Risks Being Stuck in Russia 'Permanently'
Hollywood Gets Tax Break Extension, While Payroll Extension Break Ended
After U.S. Troops Leave, Armed Drones Will Patrol Afghanistan’s Skies
Additional $2.1M Seized from Mt. Gox Accounts – Now Over $5M Total