“Cell-site tracking has become extremely important to crime fighting in the wake of the high court’s 2012 ruling that they need a warrant to place GPS trackers on vehicles. Equally important, in all the cases on the cell-site location tracking, the government argues that cell-site records are not constitutionally protected. Instead, the authorities maintain that they are business records that the telcos may hand over if the government asserts that reasonable grounds exist to believe the data is relevant to an investigation.”
(Visited 40 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
On This Day in 1933
MSNBC Blames Boston Bombing on “Deeply Racist” Alex Jones
Jimmy Carter Defends Edward Snowden, Says NSA Spying Has Compromised Nation's Democracy
California’s first mobile Amber Alert shocks strangers
FBI Won’t Reveal Extent of Illegal “Geek Squad” Spying
Lawsuit Seeks To Eliminate Warrantless Border Electronics Searches
RoboPhotoCop: Coming to a Town Near You
Italian 5- and 10- year debt yields fall to record low
Ohio, Maryland Courts Address Speed Camera Due Process Concerns
$200 to set up a lemonade stand in Illinois is 'insane': senator
Defiant nuns and monks refuse to give up Kentucky land for gas pipeline
John McCain finally admits Ron Paul was right: Iraq War was a “mistake”
How a 30-year-old lawyer exposed NSA mass surveillance of Americans—in 1975
The Best American Cities for Economic Growth
Eight killed by latest US drone strike in Pakistan