
“The encryption backdoor argument has been made and soundly rejected many times, most notably in the 1990s, when the government wanted the Clipper Chip, a requirement for a back door in technology for law enforcement and national security officials to use. A report by a group of leading security experts concluded that installing back doors would undermine security by creating an enormous vulnerability: ‘If law enforcement’s keys guaranteed access to everything, an attacker who gained access to these keys would enjoy the same privilege.'”
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/kafkaesque-sacrifice-encryption-security-name-daniel-solove
Related posts:
Alex Jones TYT Interview: Guns, Conspiracies, and Mental Health
The Shocking Truth About Regulatory Costs
Who Says You Can Kill Americans, Mr. President?
Scotland's year of decision
Steve Gibson: The Lesson of Lavabit
Isn't It High Time We Legalize Marijuana?
Bill Bonner: Here Come the Money Helicopters
DetroitCoin: Why we should make Detroit into a Bitcoin Hub
The Real New Hope for the Global Middle Class
Five Truths About Public Employee Pensions
Here’s a risk to stocks you’ve likely overlooked
Peter, Put Away Your Sword
"State Control": What the UN Firearms Treaty is All About
Peter Schiff: Protecting Workers "Rights" Protects Them From Getting Jobs
NDAA: It Still Makes a Mockery Of American Values