“The encryption backdoor argument has been made and soundly rejected many times, most notably in the 1990s, when the government wanted the Clipper Chip, a requirement for a back door in technology for law enforcement and national security officials to use. A report by a group of leading security experts concluded that installing back doors would undermine security by creating an enormous vulnerability: ‘If law enforcement’s keys guaranteed access to everything, an attacker who gained access to these keys would enjoy the same privilege.'”
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/kafkaesque-sacrifice-encryption-security-name-daniel-solove
(Visited 18 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Western logic on Syria: ‘We need to bomb it to save it’
Andrew Bacevich, The pretend war: why bombing Isil won't solve the problem
Paul Craig Roberts: Stasi In The White House
Ron Paul, Congress Believes: Spy On Thee, But Not Me
Bill Bonner: The Dumbest Investment Mistake You Can Make
Why the White House Is Panicking About Obamacare
The Lie of Moral Mercantilism
Bill Bonner: This is not a normal economy at all
Obama (Scut Farkus), Europe (Grover Dill), and Snowden (Ralphie)
Urgency: A Tactic of The State
Romney’s Neocons
Anthony Wile: Parting Company With Nigel Farage and Suggesting a New Role
The “Moral Obscenity” of Washington’s Empire
What Everyone Is Missing About Trump’s Military Parade
Does the U.S. Government Have A Right to Bomb Syria?