
“The encryption backdoor argument has been made and soundly rejected many times, most notably in the 1990s, when the government wanted the Clipper Chip, a requirement for a back door in technology for law enforcement and national security officials to use. A report by a group of leading security experts concluded that installing back doors would undermine security by creating an enormous vulnerability: ‘If law enforcement’s keys guaranteed access to everything, an attacker who gained access to these keys would enjoy the same privilege.'”
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/kafkaesque-sacrifice-encryption-security-name-daniel-solove
Related posts:
How Will White House Find Legal Grounds to Bomb Syria?
The Paul Ryan Record – Not as Fiscally Conservative as You Think
Just as Happened in Europe, the VAT Is Becoming a Money Machine for Big Government in Japan
Napolitano: Obama’s remedy for embarrassment nothing but tough talk
Bill Bonner: Gun-Toting Health Enforcers
Schizophrenic investors expect slump, bet on boom
Judge Napolitano Weighs In On Effort To Change U.S. Tax Laws to Go After Offshore Tax Havens
Guantanamo Bay: The Model for an American Police State?
Ron Paul: Federal Reserve Steals From the Poor and Gives to the Rich
What's in the Vault?
Pot Legalization Is Coming
The Tenuous Nature of Borderless Money
Who Says You Can Kill Americans, Mr. President?
I apologize for what you’re about to read
Cops held liable in SWAT killing of unarmed man; city blames jurors' racial bias