
“The encryption backdoor argument has been made and soundly rejected many times, most notably in the 1990s, when the government wanted the Clipper Chip, a requirement for a back door in technology for law enforcement and national security officials to use. A report by a group of leading security experts concluded that installing back doors would undermine security by creating an enormous vulnerability: ‘If law enforcement’s keys guaranteed access to everything, an attacker who gained access to these keys would enjoy the same privilege.'”
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/kafkaesque-sacrifice-encryption-security-name-daniel-solove
Related posts:
3 Reasons Not to Go to War with Syria
Pepe Escobar: The Real Currency, Gold and Energy War in Mali
2009 Promise of Cheaper Health Care Has Morphed Into 2013 Price Hikes
John Yoo’s Anti-Constitution Beliefs
3 Fallout Predictions from the Syrian Civil War
Bill Bonner: Is Bad News Good News for US Stocks?
The World Goes to Monetary War
Syria charade: West bent on war, UN investigation meaningless
Surveillance State? Washington Post Explains It ... Not!
"Protecting" the Public From Plants -- By Invading Their Homes
Obama: Fool Me Thrice, Shame on Whom?
Reckless Frenemy Saudi Arabia Makes World More Dangerous for America
What’s Wrong With This Picture?
DetroitCoin: Why we should make Detroit into a Bitcoin Hub
No Syrian War to Save Obama’s Face!