
“The encryption backdoor argument has been made and soundly rejected many times, most notably in the 1990s, when the government wanted the Clipper Chip, a requirement for a back door in technology for law enforcement and national security officials to use. A report by a group of leading security experts concluded that installing back doors would undermine security by creating an enormous vulnerability: ‘If law enforcement’s keys guaranteed access to everything, an attacker who gained access to these keys would enjoy the same privilege.'”
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/kafkaesque-sacrifice-encryption-security-name-daniel-solove
Related posts:
Edward Snowden: Dialectic Piñata
Egypt: What a Shame
Paul Craig Roberts: Spinning Bad Financial News Into Good
America’s Platinum Express
Glenn Greenwald: AP's dangerous Iran hoax demands an accounting and explanation
Ron Paul on the 'Korean Threat'
U.S. Economic Freedom Plunges
Should You Trust Your Instincts on Gold?
Ron Paul: Nevada Standoff a Symptom of Increasing Authoritarianism
Bill Bonner: Why Democrats are Plotting Against Obamacare
Michael Scheuer: U.S. leaders’ fingerprints are on the detonators
North Dakota Builds The First New Refinery In The U.S. Since 1976
Would You Vote for This Guy?
Many Intellectuals Can't Stand Jordan Peterson. Why?
Paul Craig Roberts: Has Washington’s Arrogance Undone Its Empire?