
“Reuters quotes Li Shouwei, deputy head of the parliament’s criminal law division under the legislative affairs committee, as saying: ‘This rule accords with the actual work need of fighting terrorism and is basically the same as what other major countries in the world do.’ China’s pointed reference to what ‘other major countries in the world do’ underlines another reason why the current attacks on encryption by government officials in the West arenot just wrong, but extremely counterproductive. After all, the US and EU nations can’t criticise or challenge other countries for introducing intrusive surveillance laws that are almost indistinguishable from their own.”
Related posts:
Google Introduces Way to Manage Your Data Beyond the Grave
Another driver killed with stuck accelerator at 119mph
Justin Raimondo: Surveillance Is for Peons
Illinois: Unconstitutional No-Taping-Cops Law Will Be Prosecuted on “Case by Case Basis”
Despite Ongoing Protest, Obama Resumes Drone Attacks in Pakistan
The Police-State's Fascist Strength
Jeffrey Tucker: Bitcoin In Depth
Georgia Must Block This Flawed Computer Crime Bill
Cold call victim forces telemarketers to pay him by using premium number
New York Fed Cancels Tours of Its Gold Vaults
Law enforcement accused of ‘policing for profit’
Obama Practices Trickle Down Economics?
T-Mobile announces unlimited global data roaming at no extra charge
Marc Faber on higher education & protecting yourself in economic collapse
Court: CIA cannot continue to deny basic information on drone program