
“‘Probable cause,’ a phrase used by the Fourth Amendment itself, has never been precisely defined, but it is not a very high standard. According to the Supreme Court, it may amount to no more than a ‘substantial chance’ or a ‘fair probability.’ Nor is getting a judge to certify probable cause much of a burden in an age of instantaneous mobile communications and electronic warrants. But police tend to take short cuts when they are available, so it is not surprising that the cops who arrested Birchfield, Beylund, and Bernard for driving under the influence (DUI) made no attempt to obtain warrants authorizing chemical testing of the alcohol in their blood.”
https://reason.com/archives/2015/12/21/want-my-blood-get-a-warrant
Related posts:
Predators in Your Backyard?
Elon Musk reveals Tesla-to-Apple poaching at about 5:1, welcomes 'iCar'
Lars Schall on Germany's gold reserves - 10-19-2012
Tons and Tons of Security Cameras Are Wide Open to Hackers
Edan Yago: The World's First Cryptocurrency-based Political Zone
Arizona Man Winds Up Jailed, Unemployed and Homeless After Photographing Courthouse
How I Lost My $50,000 Twitter Username
Going Global 2013 - Internationalizing Your Assets - By Casey Research
Microsoft says governments should stop 'hoarding' security vulnerabilities
Blackberry CEO: Apple has gone to a “dark place” with pro-privacy stance
California Gov. Shuts Down Luxury Bus for Techies
The 14 Most Ridiculous Things Police Bought With Asset Forfeiture
NYPD cracks down on cyclists on weekend after deadly crash
Man With 4th Amendment Written on Chest Wins Trial Over Airport Arrest
The Government Is Spying On Us Through Our Computers, Phones, Cars...