“If the administration succeeds in wiping the record clean, it will need to defend only Trump’s latest ban, which followed a three-month review of immigration procedures. Keeping the lower court rulings on the books would give opponents more support for claims that the new ban exceeds the president’s authority and discriminates against Muslims. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had ruled that Trump lacked proof the earlier ban was needed, and the 4th Circuit appeals court said it discriminated based on religion.”
Related posts:
Midwestern farmers brace to lose billions in trade war
Twitter CEO defends ‘principled’ data gathering policy
Bitcoin moves beyond mere money
Mexico's Vicente Fox pushes marijuana debate to forefront
A.T.F. Spent Millions Unchecked From Cigarette Smuggling Slush Fund
After gun enthusiast’s arrest, rifle-toting protestors gather outside McAllen PD
Ireland is cool for Google as its data servers like the weather
Gold Runs Out In Lisbon As Price Drop Compounds Money Misery
An Afghan Mystery: Why Are Large Shipments of Gold Leaving the Country?
Every Important Person In Bitcoin Just Got Subpoenaed By New York
Greece sells off London consulate and royal cemetery
Europe's 'new deal' for jobless dismissed as rhetoric
NSA evidence may be key to Hammarskjold mystery death
Bitcoin-Equipment Boom Benefits TSMC, AMD Sales, Report Says
Italy risks political crisis as MPS bank scandal turns 'explosive'