“The defendant, who faces a maximum of three years in prison if convicted, argued that it was ‘patently illogical’ to hold someone criminally liable for sending nude pictures to a minor—yet it’s legal to expose themselves to minors in person. The Indiana ruling is among a string of cases in which sexting laws are clearly nonsensical.”
Related posts:
LAPD refuses to release video of woman’s fatal arrest involving kick to the groin
New ‘Anti-Terror’ Checks On Beijing’s Subway Cause These Lines
A Beer War Is Brewing in Maryland
Isaac Newton's Nightmare — Charted By Marc Faber
Ex-Sen. Ben Nelson Cashes in on his Obamacare Vote
A Major Cause of the Financial Crisis Is Making a Comeback
Selfish Mining: A 25% Attack Against the Bitcoin Network
Syria War Propagandists Debunked
Chemical attack was Syria rebel provocation, former hostages say
'Internet makes global snooping possible, but harder to hide'
Why is eBay eager to pay a tax that Apple works to avoid?
Lead bullets for artists in Buenos Aires
Federal authorities now targeting lie detector coaches
Middletown CT Police Don't Obey The 4th Amendment
Arizona legislators authorize gold and silver as legal tender, again