
“The defendant, who faces a maximum of three years in prison if convicted, argued that it was ‘patently illogical’ to hold someone criminally liable for sending nude pictures to a minor—yet it’s legal to expose themselves to minors in person. The Indiana ruling is among a string of cases in which sexting laws are clearly nonsensical.”
Related posts:
Shocking video: Rio police heli opens fire in slum during drug baron car chase
Thieves dig 50-foot tunnel to steal money from a grocery store ATM
Judge blasts FBI for bugging courthouse, throws out 200 hours of recordings
EU governments get cold feet on financial transactions tax
Blackberry CEO: Apple has gone to a “dark place” with pro-privacy stance
White House Considering Top Female Treasury Official for Federal Reserve Post
Syrian Insurgent Provocations: Going For Endgame?
FATCA System Fails Government Probe, Threatens Privacy
New attack on Tor can deanonymize hidden services with 88% accuracy
Israel Lobbyist Suggests False Flag Attack to Start War with Iran
The NY Times Is as Fed-up as You Are
NSA routinely tapped in-flight Internet, intercepted exported routers
Man who beat NSA in T-shirt parody case wins against Clinton group
Bitcoin in India: Drivers and Barriers to Adoption
Stephen Badylak on "Regenerative Medicine: Possibilities and Potential" at Singularity Summit 2011