
“What constitutes material that is abusive or offensive is highly subjective. Under Hancock’s plans, that judgement, for the most part, will be left in the hands of the big social-media companies.”
Read more: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/internet-safety-just-means-internet-censorship/
Related posts:
Maryland: Speed Camera Company Admits 5.2 Percent Error Rates
U.S. Welfare Spending: 4 Times the Amount Necessary to End Poverty
NSA routinely tapped in-flight Internet, intercepted exported routers
Most Victims of Military Sex Assault: Men
Don’t Leave Home Without This
The Questions That Weren’t Answered
FATCA: Breaking through Fear with a Swiss Referendum
BitPay Banks $510K In Investment To Become PayPal for Bitcoin, Already Has 2,100 Businesses On Board
Bilderberg Cancels Hotel Reservations of Journalists Covering Secret Meeting
Blockchain.info Generates $300,000 Monthly Revenue
UK government publishes 30 tax cheats' photos on Flickr
80% dip in India gold imports linked to rampant smuggling
Occupy debt-relief campaign buys, forgives $100,000 worth of debt
Rogue Employee Fired for Turning Game Network Into Bitcoin Mining Colony
Who Could Possibly Be Safe when Police Are Around?