“Apparently, when the legislature wrote New York’s new gun law, they did not exempt the police, who carry 15 rounds in their handguns and much more in their ‘assault rifles.’ Not surprisingly, they already are working on an amendment to allow the police to ignore the law. The standard response is that the police must fight the ‘bad guys,’ who are heavily armed. However, since the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled that the police have no legal obligation to protect regular citizens, why is it right for police to be able to protect themselves but citizens cannot?”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/130846.html
(Visited 45 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Police Chief Wants Citizens As ‘Reserve Force’ To Defend Against Feds
Microsoft beats Google by adding Bitcoin currency conversion to Bing
American Entrepreneurship: Dead or Alive?
Challenge for Keynesian Anti-Sequester Hysterics
Bitcoin a Refuge For Argentines Tired of Government's Currency Despotism
Mark Thornton on Skyscrapers in ‘Le Monde’
Behind the Saudi crack-up
Who Gave Hollywood's Representatives the Same Exact DMCA Question?
ACLU Sues Federal Agencies Over License Plate Reader Information
Blueseed Entrepreneur Cruise Ship Continues Full Steam Ahead with Bitcoin Funding
Part-Time Employment as a Share of Total Employment
Study: Drug Dogs Most Likely To Err In Traffic Stop Scenarios
Telegram plans multi-billion dollar ICO for chat cryptocurrency
Will the End of Cannabis Prohibition Benefit the Small Farmer?
Secrets Police Don't Want You To Know