“Presidents had never before, to our knowledge, targeted specific Americans for military strikes. There are no court decisions that tell us if he is acting lawfully. Mr. Obama tells us not to worry, though, because his lawyers say it is fine, because experts guide the decisions and because his advisers have set up a careful process to help him decide whom he should kill. He must think we should be relieved. Oddly, under current law, Congress and the courts are involved when presidents eavesdrop on Americans, detain them or harshly interrogate them — but not when they kill them.”
Related posts:
Edward Snowden: Dialectic Piñata
An American Stasi
The Worst Investment Advice I’ve Ever Heard
Peter Schiff: Gold in the Crosshairs
Paul Ryan's corporatist past gives way to populist talk
Michael Scheuer: As scandals deepen, Obama and Republicans will intervene in Syria
The Great Obamacare Intergenerational Swindle
Lindsey Graham Should Have Visited Iran
Brandon Raub and the Thought Police
Should You Trust Your Instincts on Gold?
Expansion of Directed History: Now UN General Assembly to Act on Syrian Overthrow
“It Could Never Happen Here”
Jacob Hornberger: Cold War Fearmongering on Cuba and Korea
The National Archives: Lawbreaker and Cover-Upper
The Enduring Glow of Gold