
“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Related posts:
Jim Bovard: 20 Years Ago at Ruby Ridge - FBI Sniper Slays Mother Holding her Baby
Homeland Security Using Video Games to Recruit Top Students as Cyber Warriors
Trump's Medical Marijuana Threat Contradicts the Law and His Own Position
Vermont Marijuana Decriminalization Law Goes Into Effect
The U.S. Keeping the Eurozone in Line
Tuna Drone Joins Homeland Security Arsenal
EU To Ban U.S. Cheese From Using Names Like 'Feta' and 'Parmesan'
New York Times Tells Truth About Syria; Neo-Cons Unfazed
Privacy group to file Supreme Court petition against NSA surveillance program
What Scares Jesse Benton
Coroner: San Francisco crash victim might have been run over by fire truck
The Fundamental Characteristic that Recommends Janet Yellen
Protesters gather in DC to demand no strike against Syria
When in Rome
IRS Official Lois Lerner Refuses To Resign – Gets Paid Leave Of $3,557.69 A Week