“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Related posts:
The Federal Reserve Has Been Given Police Powers, with Glock 22s and Patrol Cars
Keiser Report: Gold, Silver, Bitcoin FTW! (E527)
The Dwindling Value of a College Education
House Intelligence Chair: Strike On Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Would Not Be An Act Of War
Government Tracking Students from Preschool to Workforce
Where the Big Players Are Buying Housing
NYPD's Crackdown on "Manspreading": Enforcing Courtesy At Gunpoint
Canada’s Banking System Is Crashing Before Our Eyes
Facebook's Free Basics Banned In India, Now Shuts Down in Egypt
“Why did you call the police? They don’t help you.”
Iraq vet arrested on terrorism charges after jogging with airsoft training rifle
Leaked Cable Confirms Israeli-Saudi Coordination To Provoke War
Elon Musk Wins Suit Against Boeing Venture, On Basis Of Russia Sanctions
FBI begins installation of $1 billion face recognition system across America
‘It was like a firing squad’: Deputies shoot Florida man in his own front yard