“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
The co-conspirators in military mass shootings
State Dept. Wants All Visa Applicants To Provide Their Social Media Information
Hacked X-Rays Could Slip Guns Past Airport Security
The Real Reason for the Iraq War
China-Russia gas deal creates Arctic winners and losers
School forces 25 hungry students to throw away lunches when they couldn’t pay
New Hampshire Town Sues Over Meter Feeding
Judge Napolitano on the Virtues of Private Justice
Obama approved F-16 fighter jets as gift to Egypt
Doug Casey on His Favorite Place in the World
10,000 Linux servers hit by malware serving spam and exploits
Snowden Leak: U.S. Paying Contractors Ten Times as Much as Bureaucrats
Do Police See Guns as a threat to "Officer Safety"?
Medical Devices Are the Next Security Nightmare
Asians Buy Gold. Westerners Sell It.