
“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Related posts:
Goldman Executive Assistant Indicted In $1.2 Million Rare Wine Theft
USAF General: Nobody's Ready for the Killer Robot
Challenging a Long-Held Assumption about Commodities
Is America now the largest and most secret tax haven?
A Helping Hand for Bernanke and Co.
Canadian Law Bans Concealing Face At Protests
World Bank Insider Blows Whistle on Corruption, Federal Reserve
Gary Johnson Issues Statement on Syria
Privacy protections booted from CISPA cybersecurity bill in closed-door hearing
Tufts University: Study promoting GMO ‘golden rice’ violated ethics rules
Can Germany Really Tax Bitcoin?
UK hospital meltdown after ransomware worm uses NSA vuln to raid IT
Defiling the Memory of President Eisenhower
Roger Waters Exposes How White Helmets Recruit Celebs With Saudi Money
Bitcoin Prices Whipsawed by Looming China Crackdown