“‘It’s pretty offensive to most of us. Most of us think if you’re going to use a drone and fly over our homes to analyze what’s going on in our backyard — not a lot of talk’s been given — but if you can fly over in the backyard, you can use all kinds of technology to see what’s happening inside the home as well. And I know there’s been a judge, and this former judge sure thinks you ought to have a warrant to do that kind of thing. But I had somebody last week in Washington that was saying, ‘Look, this goes back to we have got to have at least 50 rounds in our magazines because on average that’s about how many it takes to bring down a drone.’”
Related posts:
POLICING FOR PROFIT: Feds try to take innocent elderly couple's Mom-and-Pop motel
Frankenfish and Other Stupid Industrial Food Tricks
Family orchard ransacked by hungry mobs after owners generously offer undersized peach crop free to ...
Austrian Steelmaker Offshores Production To ... Texas
US Unemployment Rates By Age
Secret terrorism court orders declassification of its own rulings
Military Judge Took 4 Days To Determine Torture Is Legal
IRS Scandal: What Does the US Congress Expect?
Tax disclosure report reveals 'minnows' paid penalties of as much as 129x tax owed
Physicist concocts ice cream that changes color when you lick it
Bose accused of spying on end users, data mining via headphone app
Before Sir John Marks Templeton, there was Cleveland Ferguson
Marijuana Sector Update – March 24th, 2014
Russian nuclear weapons engineers used supercomputer to mine cryptocurrency
Canadian officials deny that pooping geese could have spread GMO wheat seeds