“Imagine Ma Barker’s gang or a gang of John Dillingers who unilaterally declare ‘war’ against the U.S. Would the U.S. in turn declare war against them? Metaphorically it might, in order to show a steely determination to capture and stop them. But does their declaration by itself entitle the U.S. to kill them without an attempt to capture them and place them on trial? Certainly not. Lynching is summary execution. No government can be trusted with the power of summarily killing someone, even if that person has ‘declared war’ on that government. Such a power is too easy to extend and expand and inflict upon the innocent.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/133568.html
Related posts:
The Forfeiture Curmudgeons
Jeffrey Tucker: Canada: Land of the Freer?
Factory-Like Schools Are the Child Labor Crisis of Today
You’re Not That Important
Chile is on the Cusp
Trace Mayer on Bitcoin Investments
Withdrawing Political Legitimacy
It's Happening Faster Than Even I Thought
Bob Murphy: The Myth of Wartime Prosperity
How the Military-Industrial Complex Preys on the Troops
Deciding on Living in Medellin, Colombia: The Good & Bad
Why U.S. Should Adopt Residency-Based Taxation
Will Grigg: "Ominous Threats" and Murderous Zeal
The Fourth Branch: The Rise to Power of the National Security State
'Won't Get Fooled Again'