“Imagine Ma Barker’s gang or a gang of John Dillingers who unilaterally declare ‘war’ against the U.S. Would the U.S. in turn declare war against them? Metaphorically it might, in order to show a steely determination to capture and stop them. But does their declaration by itself entitle the U.S. to kill them without an attempt to capture them and place them on trial? Certainly not. Lynching is summary execution. No government can be trusted with the power of summarily killing someone, even if that person has ‘declared war’ on that government. Such a power is too easy to extend and expand and inflict upon the innocent.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/133568.html
Related posts:
Jeffrey Tucker: Fun and Fascinating Bitcoin
The Social Deterioration of Funny, Floating Money
Robert P. Murphy: Market for Security
Wendy McElroy: Only Places Have Rights?
Why College Football Will Be Dead Within 20 Years
The Tax-Evaders Who Never Make The News
Is The Safety Of The State Really Worth More Than The Truth?
When You Need To Disappear
The Next American Revolution
Support the Egyptian Uprising and Go to Jail
Hunting for Foreign Real Estate Bargains
Bill Bonner: Is This Capitalism’s Achilles’ Heel?
America’s Gulag
Themes for 2013: Eight trends to follow in 2013 and beyond.
Ed Flynn: Milwaukee Crime Lord, Citizen Disarmament Advocate