“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
One-Man Stand Against Police Checkpoints: Joe Draego
Making Kids into Thought Criminals in the name of "Zero Tolerance"
Communism Survivor To Gun-Grabbing Politicians: "You Don't Know What Freedom Is"
Effort Launched To Free Missouri Man Serving Life For Marijuana Charge
9/11 anti-sledding provision repealed in $1.15 trillion federal spending deal
British Columbia Public Supports Marijuana Legalization
Illinois Enters the Fiscal Death Spiral
The Total Failure Of Gun Control Captured In One Photo
Tax Havens Are Crucial if We Want to Restrain Predatory Government
New Silver Liberty Dollar QR Coin Obtains Live Bitcoin Prices
Gideon Gono is Not Disappointing Me
Biden Lies about Gun Control, Of Course
The Heroic Spirit of Business
Obama Lists His Five Criteria for Death by Drone
McConnell to Vote ‘No’ On Syria As Election Looms