
“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Federal Judge Sends U.S. Marshals to Prevent Enforcement Of Trump Travel Ban
Bit of Headache for Paris, Bitcoin Regulation Added to EU Agenda
The Strongest Asset Protection Laws in the US
Bank of Canada Admits Recession, The Solution: More Bubbles
There Were Four Arrests For Every 100 Americans In 2011
Amendments To Block Unauthorized U.S. Military Involvement In Syria And Egypt Introduced
Evolution of the IMF Is Directed History
Warrantless cellphone location tracking is illegal, US circuit court rules
Chicago Issues $100 Million in Bonds to Settle Police Brutality Cases
Taxpayers Held Liable After Cops Command K9 to “Eat” Handcuffed Man
Four False Assumptions That Can Kill Your Portfolio
British Journalist Jailed Without Trial for Covering Child Sex Trafficking Trial
War on Terror's Economic and Mortality Costs Have Yet to Be Tallied
A Propaganda War
2014 will see the “Rise of the Short Sale”