
“The report classified the testimony they collected under ten general types of speed trap. The first, as represented by the camera on the D338 between Tours and Le Mans, relies upon inconsistency. One side of the road has a 90km/h speed limit (55 MPH) the other side has a 70km/h (43 MPH) limit — only the 70km/h side has a speed camera. The second type of trap is a camera placed where the speed limit is not appropriate. French motorists complained about cameras being stationed on four-lane, pedestrian free, well maintained highway with a limit of just 50km/h (31 MPH). The third trap is the camera stationed at the bottom of a downhill road.”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/40/4089.asp
Related posts:
Study: Depenalizing Drug Possession Associated With Lower Youth Drug Consumption
Krugman: "The Employment Story is Highly Unimpressive"
Federal judge: Bitcoin, “a currency,” can be regulated under American law
Japan Government To Change Inflation Calculation Ushering In Even More BOJ Liquidity
HUD director tapped to lead Sandy recovery
Occupational Licensing Is Just Another Form of Cronyism
Pentagon prepares military operation in Mali
Turning New York City into Detroit?
Switzerland's Earth Houses resemble real-life Hobbit Holes
Cannabis legalisation in Washington and Colorado: A game changer
Two Huge Victories in Colorado for the Second Amendment
DEA Responds to Legal Weed in Colorado and Washington: "Enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act...
The Crucifixion of Tomas Young
The Pentagon: Angry Birds Hold the Key to Our Security
China is Banking on a Detroit Comeback